Suppr超能文献

切开挂线术与切开减压引流挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的随机对照试验。

Cutting seton versus decompression and drainage seton in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Proctology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, No 2 Yinghua East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7838. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11712-9.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the efficacy between decompression and drainage seton (DADS) and cutting seton (CS) in the treatment of high complex anal fistula. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DADS or CS group. The primary outcome was the rate of wound healing. Second outcomes included time taken to return to work, postoperative pain, the severity of fecal incontinence and other complications. A total of 120 patients with a mean age of 39 years were included. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete wound healing at 1 year. The mean time taken to return to work was 5 ± 2 days in DADS group, shorter than CS group (10 ± 3, p < 0.001). Mean vaizey incontinence score and the post-operation pain in DADS group was significantly lower than CS group. No significant difference was found between two groups in the incidence of complications. DADS is as effective as Cutting seton for the treatment of high complex anal fistula but is associated with less postoperative pain and better sphincter function preserving.

摘要

本研究旨在比较切开挂线术(CS)与切开引流挂线术(DADS)治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效。患者按 1:1 随机分配至 DADS 或 CS 组。主要结局为创面愈合率。次要结局包括恢复工作时间、术后疼痛、粪便失禁严重程度和其他并发症。共纳入 120 例患者,平均年龄 39 岁。1 年时完全愈合率无显著差异。DADS 组患者恢复工作的平均时间为 5±2 天,短于 CS 组(10±3,p<0.001)。DADS 组的 Vaizey 失禁评分和术后疼痛均显著低于 CS 组。两组并发症发生率无显著差异。DADS 治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果与 CS 相当,但术后疼痛较轻,肛门括约肌功能保存更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/9098520/8af039cc739a/41598_2022_11712_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验