Suppr超能文献

青少年大麻使用的简短干预:系统评价、荟萃分析和证据图谱。

Brief interventions for cannabis use in emerging adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map.

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4S4, Canada.

Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th St, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Nov 1;204:107565. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107565. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review summarizes and critically appraises the existing literature on brief interventions (BIs) for cannabis use among emerging adults.

METHODS

Eligible BIs were operationalized as 1-2 sessions focused exclusively on cannabis use for samples with mean ages between 15 and 30. Outcomes related to cannabis use, other substance use, mental health, help-seeking, or functional status were included. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 3638 records, identifying 244 studies for full-text screening. In total, 32 BIs in 26 primary studies with 6318 participants were included.

RESULTS

Participants were typically not seeking treatment and using cannabis at least once a month. Most interventions were motivational, single sessions, and delivered in person. Few discussed concurrent psychiatric conditions. Pooling results at 1-3 months post-intervention, BIs compared to passive control slightly reduced symptoms of cannabis use disorder (SMD -0.14 [95% CI -0.26 to -0.01]) and increased the odds of abstinence (OR 1.73 [95% CI 1.13-2.66]). Other outcome results often favored BIs but were not significant. Results of studies comparing types of BIs (k = 8) or BIs to longer interventions (k = 1) are discussed narratively. Quality assessment suggested low to very low-quality evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This review indicates that BIs targeting non-treatment seeking emerging adults result in significant reductions in symptoms of cannabis use disorder and an increased likelihood of cannabis abstinence, however evidence is of low quality.

摘要

目的

本系统评价总结和批判性评估了现有关于针对青少年使用大麻的简短干预措施(BIs)的文献。

方法

合格的 BI 被定义为专门针对 15 至 30 岁之间的样本进行的 1-2 次疗程,重点关注大麻使用。包括与大麻使用、其他物质使用、心理健康、寻求帮助或功能状态相关的结果。两名独立审查员总共筛选了 3638 条记录,确定了 244 项进行全文筛选的研究。共有 26 项初级研究中的 32 项 BI 纳入了 6318 名参与者。

结果

参与者通常不寻求治疗,每月至少使用一次大麻。大多数干预措施是动机性的、单次疗程,并且是面对面进行的。很少讨论同时存在的精神疾病。在干预后 1-3 个月汇总结果,BI 与被动对照相比,略降低了大麻使用障碍的症状(SMD-0.14[95%CI-0.26 至-0.01]),增加了戒除的几率(OR1.73[95%CI1.13 至 2.66])。其他结果通常有利于 BI,但并不显著。讨论了比较不同类型 BI(k=8)或 BI 与更长干预措施(k=1)的研究结果。质量评估表明证据质量为低到极低。

结论

本综述表明,针对非治疗性寻求的青少年的 BI 可显著降低大麻使用障碍的症状,并增加大麻戒除的可能性,但证据质量较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验