• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在老年急症护理环境中实施开放式探视的实际评估。

A realist evaluation of the implementation of open visiting in an acute care setting for older people.

机构信息

Colloboration For Leadership in Applied Health Research Greater Manchester (NIHR), Greater Manchester, UK.

The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4653-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4653-5
PMID:31752862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6873458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open visiting refers to the principle of unrestricted visiting hours in the hospital setting to enable relatives, families and carers to visit at any time. There has been recognition that open visiting supports the principle of patient and family supported care and improves communication. Despite this there has been difficulty in implementing open visiting and barriers identified. The aims of this study were therefore to evaluate the implementation of open visiting, the barriers to implementation, sustainability and the impact of open visiting on communication between health care professionals, families and carers.

METHODS

The study was conducted on two large acute wards for the older person. Realist evaluation methods were used to understand 'what works well, how, for whom and to what extent.' Mixed methods were employed including qualitative interviews and descriptive analyses of routine data sets. Following the methodology of realist evaluation, programme theories were identified a long with the context, mechanisms and outcomes of implementation, to better understand the implementation process.

RESULTS

The results of this study identified some key findings, demonstrating that open visiting does improve communication and can help to build trusting relationships between families/carers and health care professionals (HCP). Barriers to implementation were based on the belief that it would impinge on routines within the ward setting. To achieve the principles of patient and family/carer centred care, the key mechanisms are the confidence and skills of individual nurses and health care assistants to engage with relatives/carers, whilst retaining a sense of control, particularly when care is being delivered to other patients.

CONCLUSION

In summary, open visiting creates a positive culture which fosters better relationships between families/carers and HCPs. Involving families/carers as partners in care does not happen automatically in an environment where open visiting is the policy, but requires engagement with staff to encourage and support relatives/carers.

摘要

背景

开放探视是指在医院环境中实行无限制探视时间的原则,以使亲属、家属和护理人员随时可以探视。人们已经认识到,开放探视支持患者和家属支持护理的原则,并改善了沟通。尽管如此,在实施开放探视方面仍存在困难,并确定了障碍。因此,本研究的目的是评估开放探视的实施情况、实施障碍、可持续性以及开放探视对医护人员、家属和护理人员之间沟通的影响。

方法

该研究在两家大型老年急性病房进行。采用现实主义评估方法来了解“哪些方面有效、如何有效、对谁有效以及在何种程度上有效”。采用混合方法,包括定性访谈和常规数据集的描述性分析。根据现实主义评估的方法,确定了方案理论,以及实施的背景、机制和结果,以更好地理解实施过程。

结果

本研究的结果确定了一些关键发现,表明开放探视确实可以改善沟通,并有助于在家庭/护理人员和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)之间建立信任关系。实施障碍基于这样一种信念,即它会影响病房环境中的常规工作。为了实现以患者和家庭/护理人员为中心的护理原则,关键机制是个别护士和保健助理的信心和技能,以便与亲属/护理人员进行互动,同时保持控制感,特别是在为其他患者提供护理时。

结论

总之,开放探视营造了一种积极的文化氛围,促进了家庭/护理人员和 HCP 之间更好的关系。在开放探视是政策的环境中,让家属/护理人员作为护理伙伴参与并不自动发生,而是需要与员工接触,以鼓励和支持亲属/护理人员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d275/6873458/889222a3c68d/12913_2019_4653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d275/6873458/889222a3c68d/12913_2019_4653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d275/6873458/889222a3c68d/12913_2019_4653_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A realist evaluation of the implementation of open visiting in an acute care setting for older people.在老年急症护理环境中实施开放式探视的实际评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4653-5.
2
Communication between family carers and health professionals about end-of-life care for older people in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study.急性医院环境中家庭照顾者与医护人员就老年人临终关怀问题的沟通:一项定性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Aug 1;14:35. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0032-0.
3
Effectiveness and experiences of families and support workers participating in peer-led parenting support programs delivered as home visiting programs: a comprehensive systematic review.家庭和支持工作者参与以同伴为主导的育儿支持项目(作为家访项目开展)的有效性和经验:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Oct;14(10):167-208. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003166.
4
Intentional rounding: a realist evaluation using case studies in acute and care of older people hospital wards.有意接触:急性和老年护理病房中案例研究的现实主义评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):1341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10358-1.
5
Gatekeeping and legitimization: how informal carers' relationship with health care workers is revealed in their everyday interactions.把关与合法化:非正式护理人员与医护人员的关系如何在他们的日常互动中得以展现。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Nov;36(3):364-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01984.x.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
How do we facilitate carers' involvement in decision making?我们如何促进护理人员参与决策?
J Adv Nurs. 2001 May;34(3):329-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01762.x.
8
Children visiting family and friends on adult intensive care units: the nurses' perspective.儿童前往成人重症监护病房探视家人和朋友:护士的观点。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Feb;31(2):330-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01293.x.
9
10
Why are family carers of people with dementia dissatisfied with general hospital care? A qualitative study.为什么痴呆患者的家庭护理人员对综合医院的护理不满意?一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Sep 24;12:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-57.

引用本文的文献

1
"Three Sides to Every Story": Living the Patient, Carer and Staff Experience of COVID.“每个故事都有三个方面”:体验新冠疫情下患者、护理人员及医护人员的生活
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2025 Jan 16;12:23333936241292737. doi: 10.1177/23333936241292737. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Characteristics of the studies using realist evaluation to assess interventions that address psychosocial healthcare issues in older adults: a scoping review.使用现实主义评价评估干预措施以解决老年人心理社会保健问题的研究特征:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 30;14(8):e078256. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078256.
3
Open visitation policy in intensive care units in Jordan: cross-sectional study of nurses' perceptions.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing change in older people's acute care.在老年人急性护理中实施变革。
Nurs Times. 2016 Aug;112(27-28):15-17.
2
Open visitation and nurse job satisfaction: An integrative review.开放探视与护士工作满意度:综合述评。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4868-4876. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13919. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.拉美西斯二世现实主义评价报告标准。
约旦重症监护病房的开放式探视政策:护士认知的横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01116-5.
4
Safety and Family-Centered Care during Restriction of Hospital Visits due to COVID-19: The Experience of Family Members.COVID-19疫情期间限制医院探视时的安全与以家庭为中心的护理:家庭成员的经历
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 20;12(10):1546. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101546.
5
Family Perspectives Related to Caring for Mental Health Care Users: A Case Study in the Long-Term Mental Health Institutions of Limpopo Province, South Africa.家庭视角下的精神健康照护者相关问题:以南非林波波省长期精神健康机构为例的一项案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710511.
6
Restricted family presence for hospitalized surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: How hospital care providers and families navigated ethical tensions and experiences of institutional betrayal.新冠疫情期间住院手术患者的家属探视限制:医院医护人员与家属如何应对伦理困境及机构背叛经历
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100147. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100147. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
The Implications of Family Members' Absence from Hospital Visits during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Nurses' Perceptions.《COVID-19 大流行期间家庭成员缺席医院探视的影响:护士的看法》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 24;19(15):8991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158991.
8
Engaging Families in Adult Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.《美国心脏协会成人心血管护理中的家庭参与科学声明》
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e025859. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025859. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Restricted visitation policies in acute care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.COVID-19 大流行期间急性护理环境中的限制探视政策:范围综述。
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 25;25(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03763-7.
10
Combining Realist approaches and Normalization Process Theory to understand implementation: a systematic review.结合现实主义方法和规范化过程理论以理解实施情况:一项系统综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 26;2(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00172-3.
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0643-1.
4
Open visiting leads to drop in complaints.开放探视导致投诉减少。
Nurs Times. 2015;111(36-37):6.
5
Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.方案——拉美西斯二世研究:制定实用主义评价的指南和报告标准。
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 3;5(8):e008567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008567.
6
The impact of opening visitation access on patient and family experience.探访权开放对患者和家属体验的影响。
J Nurs Adm. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(7/8):403-10. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000090.
7
Using interactive workshops to prompt knowledge exchange: a realist evaluation of a knowledge to action initiative.使用互动研讨会来促进知识交流:一项知识转化行动倡议的现实主义评价。
Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
Eliminating visiting hour restrictions in hospitals.取消医院的探视时间限制。
J Healthc Qual. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):54-7. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12035. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
9
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses.RAMSES 出版规范:现实主义综合研究。
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21.
10
Family presence: visitation in the adult ICU.家属陪伴:成人重症监护病房的探视
Crit Care Nurse. 2012 Aug;32(4):76-8.