LIKES Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, Rautpohjankatu 8, 40700, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Faculty of Education, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0866-6.
The benefits of physical activity (PA) on children's health and wellbeing are well established. However, the benefits of PA on academic performance and particularly on mathematics performance warrant systematic analysis. Mathematics is one of the core subjects in school education globally.
We systematically searched, analysed and synthesized the literature on the effects of school-based PA interventions on mathematics performance in children aged 4-16. A total of 29 studies consisting of randomised trials and other interventions with control groups were identified through a systematic search, and 11 of them provided sufficient data and appropriate design for a meta-analysis.
Of the 29 studies involving 11,264 participants, positive overall effects of a PA intervention on mathematics performance were found in 13 studies (45%) and neutral overall effects in 15 studies (52%). Only one study reported a significant negative result for a subgroup of children in the first half of the intervention. In a risk-of-bias assessment, 12 studies had low, 17 moderate, and none had a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of 11 studies suggested an overall small positive effect (ES = 0.23) of the interventions. Only one study in the meta-analysis indicated a negative effect in one of the intervention groups.
Adding PA to the school day may enhance children's mathematics performance or has no negative effects on performance. Several types of PA interventions can be recommended to be added to the school day.
体育活动(PA)对儿童健康和幸福的益处已得到充分证实。然而,PA 对学业成绩,尤其是对数学成绩的益处需要系统地分析。数学是全球学校教育的核心科目之一。
我们系统地搜索、分析和综合了关于基于学校的 PA 干预对 4-16 岁儿童数学成绩影响的文献。通过系统搜索,共确定了 29 项研究,包括随机试验和其他对照干预研究,其中 11 项研究提供了足够的数据和适当的设计进行荟萃分析。
在涉及 11264 名参与者的 29 项研究中,13 项研究(45%)发现 PA 干预对数学成绩有积极的总体影响,15 项研究(52%)有中性的总体影响。只有一项研究报告了干预前半段的一个儿童亚组有显著的负面结果。在风险偏倚评估中,12 项研究为低风险,17 项研究为中风险,没有研究为高风险。11 项研究的荟萃分析表明干预的总体效果为小幅度积极(ES=0.23)。荟萃分析中的一项研究仅表明干预组之一有负面效果。
在学校日增加 PA 可能会提高儿童的数学成绩,或者对成绩没有负面影响。可以推荐几种类型的 PA 干预措施添加到学校日中。