Fu Chu-Hua, Wang Ning, Chen Hua-Yun, Chen Qian-Xue
Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang 441000, Hubei Province, China.
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Dec;22(6):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Thalamic hemorrhage breaking into ventricles (THBIV) is a devastating disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. Endoscopic surgery (ES) may improve outcomes, although there is no consensus on its superiority. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ES and compared the outcomes of different management strategies by ES, hematoma puncture and drainage (HPD), and external ventricular drainage (EVD) in patients with THBIV.
We retrospectively analyzed patients with THBIV treated by ES, HPD, or EVD at our hospital from June 2015 to June 2018. Patients were categorized into anteromedial and posterolateral groups based on THBIV location, and then the two groups were further divided into ES, HPD, and EVD subgroups. Individualized surgical approach was adopted according to the location of the hematoma in the ES subgroups. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were investigated.
We analyzed 211 consecutive patients. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics or incidence of perioperative procedure-related complications (postoperative rebleeding and intracranial infection) in either anteromedial or posterolateral groups. Compared with other therapeutic methods, the ES subgroups had the highest hematoma evacuation rate, shortest drainage time, and lowest incidence of chronic ventricular dilatation (all p < 0.05). Among the three anteromedial subgroups, ES subgroup had the best clinical outcomes which was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, followed by HPD and EVD subgroups (p < 0.01); while in the posterolateral subgroups, clinical outcomes in the ES and HPD subgroups were similar and better than that in the EVD subgroup (p = 0.037).
Individualized surgical ES approach for removal of thalamic and ventricular hematomas is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective strategy for the treatment of THBIV with a thalamic hematoma volume of 10-30 mL.
丘脑出血破入脑室(THBIV)是一种具有高发病率和死亡率的毁灭性疾病。尽管内镜手术(ES)的优越性尚无定论,但它可能改善治疗效果。我们研究了ES的疗效和安全性,并比较了ES、血肿穿刺引流(HPD)和脑室外引流(EVD)这三种不同治疗策略对THBIV患者的治疗效果。
我们回顾性分析了2015年6月至2018年6月在我院接受ES、HPD或EVD治疗的THBIV患者。根据THBIV的位置将患者分为前内侧组和后外侧组,然后将两组进一步分为ES、HPD和EVD亚组。ES亚组根据血肿位置采用个体化手术方法。研究了患者的特征和手术结果。
我们分析了211例连续患者。前内侧组或后外侧组在临床特征或围手术期与手术相关并发症(术后再出血和颅内感染)发生率方面均无显著差异。与其他治疗方法相比,ES亚组的血肿清除率最高,引流时间最短,慢性脑室扩张发生率最低(均p<0.05)。在前内侧的三个亚组中,采用改良Rankin量表评估,ES亚组的临床效果最佳,其次是HPD亚组和EVD亚组(p<0.01);而后外侧亚组中,ES亚组和HPD亚组的临床效果相似且优于EVD亚组(p=0.037)。
对于丘脑血肿体积为10-30 mL的THBIV患者,采用个体化手术ES方法清除丘脑和脑室内血肿是一种微创、安全且有效的治疗策略。