Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Health Protection Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032185.
To explore the facilitators and obstacles to the development and implementation of the Reduce Antimicrobial Prescribing in Care Homes intervention.
We used a mixed-methods approach. We conducted focus groups with care home staff and relatives of residents, and interviews with general practitioners (GPs) and home managers, completed observational visits and collected demographic data, training attendance records and data on the use of a decision-making algorithm. We used normalisation process theory to inform topic guides and interpretation of the data.
Six care homes, three in Northern Ireland and three in the West Midlands, England.
A decision-making algorithm for urinary tract, respiratory tract and skin and soft-tissue infections, plus small group interactive training for care home staff.
We ran 21 training sessions across the six homes and trained 35/42 (83%) of nurses and 101/219 (46%) of all care staff. Care home staff reported using the decision-making algorithm 81 times. Postimplementation, staff reported being more knowledgeable about antimicrobial resistance but were unsure if the intervention would change how GPs prescribed antimicrobials. The pressures of everyday work in some homes meant that engagement was challenging at times. Staff felt that some of the symptoms included in decision-making algorithm, despite being evidence based, were not easy to detect in residents with dementia or urinary incontinence. Some staff did not use the decision-making algorithm, noting that their own knowledge of the resident was more important.
We delivered a training package to a substantial number of key staff in care homes. A decision-making algorithm for common infections in care homes empowered staff but was challenging to operationalise at times. A future study should consider the findings from the process evaluation to help ensure the successful implementation on a larger scale.
探索在养老院实施减少抗菌药物处方干预的发展和实施的促进因素和障碍。
我们采用混合方法。我们对养老院工作人员和居民的亲属进行了焦点小组讨论,对全科医生(GP)和家庭经理进行了访谈,完成了观察访问,并收集了人口统计学数据、培训出席记录以及使用决策算法的数据。我们使用常规化进程理论来为主题指南提供信息并解释数据。
英格兰西米德兰兹和北爱尔兰的 6 家养老院。
一种用于尿路感染、呼吸道感染和皮肤及软组织感染的决策算法,以及针对养老院工作人员的小组互动培训。
我们在 6 家养老院共开展了 21 次培训,培训了 42 名护士中的 35 名(83%)和 219 名全体工作人员中的 101 名(46%)。养老院工作人员报告使用决策算法 81 次。实施后,工作人员报告对抗菌药物耐药性的了解更多,但不确定该干预措施是否会改变全科医生开具抗菌药物的方式。一些养老院日常工作的压力意味着有时参与会很有挑战性。工作人员认为,决策算法中包含的一些症状,尽管有证据支持,但在患有痴呆症或尿失禁的居民中不易察觉。一些工作人员没有使用决策算法,他们指出,自己对居民的了解更为重要。
我们向养老院的大量关键工作人员提供了培训套餐。养老院常见感染的决策算法使工作人员有能力做出决策,但有时在实施方面具有挑战性。未来的研究应考虑从过程评估中得出的发现,以帮助确保在更大范围内成功实施。