• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘制与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸相关体验的证据图谱:范围综述方案。

Mapping the evidence of experiences related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Health in Biała Podlaska, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland

Faculty of Physical Education and Health in Biała Podlaska, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032865.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032865
PMID:31753899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6886945/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the diagnosis and management of this condition, may lead to poorer body image and diminished psychosocial functioning. Furthermore, treatment, especially bracing and surgery as well as screening, remain controversial and debated, with an unclear evidence base. Personal experiences in terms of issues such as person-centred care, shared decision making, and patient and public involvement, are contemporarily recognised as highly valued. Nonetheless, people's experiences related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is an issue underrepresented in current systematic reviews and systematically developed recommendations. There appears a substantial imbalance between a vast amount of biomedical research reports, and sporadic biopsychosocial publications in this field. The objective of this planned scoping review is to explore and map the available evidence from various sources to address a broad question of what is known about experiences of all those touched, directly and indirectly, by the problem of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We based our protocol on the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review method, including the Population - Concept - Context framework, to formulate the objectives, research questions, eligibility criteria and conduct characteristics of the study. We will consider any primary study designs, research synthesis reports, as well as narrative reviews and opinion pieces. We will not restrict eligible publications to English language. Search and selection processes will include academic and grey literature searches using multiple electronic databases, search engines and websites, hand searches, and contacting the authors. We will use a customised data charting table and present a narrative synthesis of the results.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Scoping review is a secondary study, aiming at synthesising data from publicly available publications, hence it does not require ethical approval. We will submit the report to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminate it among professionals involved in scoliosis management, guideline and recommendation development, and policymaking.

摘要

简介

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸,对这种疾病的诊断和管理可能会导致较差的身体形象和降低的社会心理功能。此外,治疗,特别是支具和手术以及筛查,仍然存在争议和争论,证据基础不明确。在以以人为中心的护理、共同决策以及患者和公众参与等问题为代表的个人经历方面,目前被认为是非常有价值的。尽管如此,人们在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸方面的经历在当前的系统评价和系统开发的建议中是一个代表性不足的问题。在这个领域,大量的生物医学研究报告与零星的生物心理社会出版物之间存在着巨大的不平衡。本计划的范围综述的目的是探索和绘制来自各种来源的现有证据,以解决一个广泛的问题,即直接和间接受到青少年特发性脊柱侧凸问题影响的所有人的经历都有哪些。

方法和分析

我们的方案基于乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围综述方法,包括人口-概念-背景框架,以制定研究的目标、研究问题、纳入标准和研究特征。我们将考虑任何主要的研究设计、研究综合报告,以及叙述性综述和观点文章。我们不会将合格的出版物仅限于英语语言。搜索和选择过程将包括使用多个电子数据库、搜索引擎和网站、手工搜索以及联系作者的学术和灰色文献搜索。我们将使用定制的数据图表表,并对结果进行叙述性综合。

伦理和传播

范围综述是一种二次研究,旨在综合来自公开出版物的数据,因此不需要伦理批准。我们将把报告提交给同行评议的期刊,并在参与脊柱侧凸管理、指南和建议制定以及决策制定的专业人员中传播。

相似文献

1
Mapping the evidence of experiences related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol.绘制与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸相关体验的证据图谱:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032865.
2
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Effectiveness of orthotic treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol of systematic reviews.矫形治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的疗效:系统评价的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 8;13(11):e078064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078064.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Methodology and application of three-dimensional technology for brace design and production for treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review protocol.方法学与三维技术在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸支具设计与制作中的应用:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e079673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079673.
7
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
8
Mapping adolescent sexual and reproductive health research in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a scoping review.绘制撒哈拉以南非洲地区青少年性健康和生殖健康研究图谱:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 1;10(7):e035335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035335.
9
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.一项关于生物医学期刊稿件评审过程中同行评审员角色和任务的范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017468. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017468.
10
Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review protocol.晚期肾病中的共同决策:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 27;10(2):e034142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034142.

引用本文的文献

1
Triple-Rod Construct Approach for Severe Rigid Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Case Series.严重僵硬性脊柱侧弯的三棒结构治疗方法:一个综合病例系列
Cureus. 2025 Mar 31;17(3):e81546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81546. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
No Recommendation Is (at Least Presently) the Best Recommendation: An Updating Quality Appraisal of Recommendations on Screening for Scoliosis.目前(至少是这样),最好的建议是不建议:对脊柱侧凸筛查建议进行更新的质量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 30;19(11):6659. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116659.
3
Associations between study questionnaire-assessed need and school doctor-evaluated benefit of routine health checks: an observational study.研究问卷评估的需求与校医评估的常规健康检查益处之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02810-0.
4
Screening for scoliosis - New recommendations, old dilemmas, no straight solutions.脊柱侧弯筛查——新建议,旧困境,无直接解决方案。
World J Orthop. 2020 Sep 18;11(9):364-379. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i9.364.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental health of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and their parents in China: a cross-sectional survey.中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者及其家长的心理健康状况:一项横断面调查。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 May 14;19(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2128-1.
2
The updated Joanna Briggs Institute Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare.循证卫生保健的 Joanna Briggs 研究所更新模型。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Mar;17(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000155.
3
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Focusing on overdiagnosis as a driver of too much medicine.将过度诊断视为过度医疗的一个驱动因素。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 17;362:k3494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3494.
5
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.参与患者以提高医疗质量:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z.
6
Evolving Recommendations for Scoliosis Screening: A Compelling Need for Further Research.脊柱侧弯筛查的不断演变的建议:迫切需要进一步研究。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):127-129. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20190.
7
Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.同一领域,不同物种:五种知识综合类型的目的不同,方法实施和质量也不同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
10
Scoliosis and the Social Media: Facebook as a Means of Information Exchange.脊柱侧弯与社交媒体:作为信息交流手段的脸书
Spine Deform. 2017 Mar;5(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.11.003.