• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通用型黏结剂与两种酸蚀-冲洗型黏结系统的牙本质黏结耐久性比较。

Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8310, Japan.

Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Aug;24(8):2889-2897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y
PMID:31754869
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare dentin bond durability under different degradation conditions between two etch-and-rinse (ER) systems and a universal adhesive in ER mode.

METHOD

This study used a universal adhesive [Scotchbond Universal (SU)], a three-step ER adhesive [Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SM)], and a two-step ER adhesive [Single Bond Plus (SB)]. A phosphoric acid-etching agent was applied to bovine dentin prior to the application of either a primer or the adhesive. After acid etching, bonding procedures were conducted. The specimens were divided into three group classes: (1) subjected to 10,000, 30,000, or 50,000 thermal cycles (TC); (2) stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 6 months or 1 year (WS); and (3) stored in distilled water for 24 h (baseline). Shear bond strength (SBS) tests were conducted.

RESULTS

SB showed a higher baseline SBS than the other adhesives. Defining the baseline SBS value for each adhesive system as 100%, TC groups ranged from 56.1 to 70.3% for SM, from 98.4 to 103.7% for SB, and from 120.3 to 126.7% for SU. WS groups ranged from 66.2 to 71.4% for SM, from 98.1 to 103.3% for SB, and from 102.5 to 118.1% for SU.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SB showed relatively stable dentin bond performance under all degradation conditions, SM showed decreased dentin SBS with prolonged degradation. SU did not show any significant decrease in SBS from the baseline under any degradation condition.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The universal adhesive showed comparable adhesive performance with the two-step ER adhesive.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种全酸蚀(ER)系统和一种通用型 ER 模式下的通用型胶粘剂在不同降解条件下的牙本质粘结耐久性。

方法

本研究使用一种通用型胶粘剂[Scotchbond Universal(SU)]、一种三步 ER 胶粘剂[Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus(SM)]和一种两步 ER 胶粘剂[Single Bond Plus(SB)]。在应用底漆或胶粘剂之前,将磷酸酸蚀剂应用于牛牙本质。酸蚀后进行粘结程序。将标本分为三组:(1)经受 10000、30000 或 50000 次热循环(TC);(2)在 37°C 的蒸馏水中储存 6 个月或 1 年(WS);和(3)在蒸馏水中储存 24 小时(基线)。进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。

结果

SB 的基线 SBS 高于其他胶粘剂。将每种胶粘剂系统的基线 SBS 值定义为 100%,TC 组 SM 的范围为 56.1%至 70.3%,SB 的范围为 98.4%至 103.7%,SU 的范围为 120.3%至 126.7%。WS 组 SM 的范围为 66.2%至 71.4%,SB 的范围为 98.1%至 103.3%,SU 的范围为 102.5%至 118.1%。

结论

尽管 SB 在所有降解条件下表现出相对稳定的牙本质粘结性能,但 SM 随着降解时间的延长,牙本质 SBS 降低。SU 在任何降解条件下,SBS 均未从基线显著下降。

临床相关性

通用型胶粘剂与两步 ER 胶粘剂具有相当的粘结性能。

相似文献

1
Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.通用型黏结剂与两种酸蚀-冲洗型黏结系统的牙本质黏结耐久性比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Aug;24(8):2889-2897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
Effect of Active Application on Bond Durability of Universal Adhesives.活性应用对通用型胶粘剂粘结耐久性的影响。
Oper Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):188-199. doi: 10.2341/17-384-L. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode.自酸蚀模式下通用粘结剂对牛牙釉质的粘结耐久性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2196-x. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Comparison of different etch-and-rinse adhesive systems based on shear fatigue dentin bond strength and morphological features the interface.比较不同的酸蚀-冲洗型黏结系统基于剪切疲劳牙本质黏结强度和形态学特征的界面。
Dent Mater. 2021 Mar;37(3):e109-e117. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
5
Influence of Application Time on Dentin Bond Performance in Different Etching Modes of Universal Adhesives.不同通用型粘结剂酸蚀模式下应用时间对牙本质粘结性能的影响。
Oper Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):183-195. doi: 10.2341/19-028-L. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems.不同蚀刻模式对通用黏接系统牙本质黏接强度和疲劳强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2016 Feb;32(2):e9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
7
Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives.降解条件对三种通用型粘结剂牙本质粘结耐久性的影响。
J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
8
Comparing Various Resin Luting Cement Systems in Different Etching Modes Through Bond Durability and Morphological Features.比较不同蚀刻模式下各种树脂水门汀粘结系统的粘结耐久性和形态特征。
Oper Dent. 2024 Mar 1;49(2):231-244. doi: 10.2341/23-096-L.
9
Bonding strength of universal adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG Laser-Irradiated Dentin.通用粘结剂与铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光照射牙本质的粘结强度。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Jan;21(1):93-98. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.224792.
10
Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives.储水对自酸蚀粘接剂疲劳强度的影响。
J Dent. 2015 Dec;43(12):1416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Ultraviolet Light on the Shear Bond Strength of Commercial Dental Adhesives.紫外线对商用牙科粘合剂剪切粘结强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;18(16):3772. doi: 10.3390/ma18163772.
2
Compressive strength evaluation of two composites with and without fiber reinforcement used as restorative material in incisal edge: An study.两种有纤维增强和无纤维增强的复合材料作为切缘修复材料的抗压强度评估:一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Feb 1;17(2):e168-e173. doi: 10.4317/jced.62410. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Bond Strength, Microleakage, Microgaps, and Marginal Adaptation of Self-adhesive Resin Composites to Tooth Substrates with and without Preconditioning with Universal Adhesives.
自粘性树脂复合材料与经过和未经过通用粘合剂预处理的牙齿基质之间的粘结强度、微渗漏、微间隙及边缘适应性
J Adhes Dent. 2024 Feb 8;26:53-64. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4949691.
4
Long-Term In Vitro Adhesive Properties of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin.两种通用型粘结剂与牙本质的长期体外粘结性能
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;16(9):3458. doi: 10.3390/ma16093458.
5
Direct and semi-direct resin composite restoration in large cavity preparations: analysis of dentin bond strength stability and bottom/top microhardness ratio in a cavity model.直接和间接树脂复合材料修复大面积牙体缺损:腔模型中牙本质粘结强度稳定性和底部/顶部显微硬度比值的分析。
Odontology. 2022 Jul;110(3):482-488. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00680-7. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
Influence of Low-Level Laser Modification and Adhesive Application Mode on the Bonding Efficiency of Universal Adhesives to Er:YAG Laser-Ablated Dentin.低强度激光改性及粘结剂应用方式对通用粘结剂与铒激光蚀刻牙本质粘结效率的影响
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Feb 16;12:e7. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.07. eCollection 2021.
7
Aging Methods-An Evaluation of Their Influence on Bond Strength.老化方法——对其对粘结强度影响的评估
Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):448-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721906. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
8
Comparison between Shear Bond Strength of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers-Assisted Dentinal Adhesion of Self-Adhering Resin Composite: An Ex Vivo Study.铒钇铝石榴石激光与铒铬钇钪镓石榴石激光辅助自粘结树脂复合材料牙本质粘结的剪切粘结强度比较:一项体外研究
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Jul 1;8(3):66. doi: 10.3390/dj8030066.