Hurtado Ana, Fuentes Victoria, Cura María, Tamayo Aitana, Ceballos Laura
International Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28008 Madrid, Spain.
IDIBO Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;16(9):3458. doi: 10.3390/ma16093458.
The composition of universal adhesives, as well as the adhesive strategy, may influence bonding effectiveness and durability. This study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage (NL), immediately and after 6-month aging, and in situ degree of conversion (DC), of two universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SBU; Xeno Select, XEN) applied with etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies, in comparison with a two-step SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE). Dentin surfaces of fifty human third molars were randomly assigned to the following adhesives: two universal adhesives, SBU and XEN, applied in ER or SE mode and CSE, used as control. Teeth were sectioned into beams to be tested under µTBS, half of them after 24 h, and the rest after 6 months of water aging. Selected beams from each tooth were used for NL evaluation and in situ DC quantification. SBU and CSE showed significantly higher mean µTBS and lower nanoleakage than XEN, regardless of the evaluation time and adhesion strategy. XEN-SE yielded the lowest degree of conversion. Therefore, adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin are material dependent, regardless of the adhesion strategy, exhibiting XEN a significantly worse performance than SBU.
通用型粘结剂的成分以及粘结策略可能会影响粘结效果和耐久性。本研究旨在评估两种采用酸蚀冲洗(ER)和自酸蚀(SE)策略应用的通用型粘结剂(3M Scotchbond通用粘结剂,SBU;Xeno Select,XEN),与一种两步法自酸蚀粘结剂(可乐丽Clearfil SE Bond,CSE)相比,在即时以及6个月老化后,其微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)、纳米渗漏(NL)以及原位转化率(DC)。将五十颗人类第三磨牙的牙本质表面随机分配至以下粘结剂:两种通用型粘结剂,SBU和XEN,采用ER或SE模式应用,以及用作对照的CSE。牙齿被切成梁状以进行µTBS测试,其中一半在24小时后测试,其余在水老化6个月后测试。从每颗牙齿中选取的梁用于NL评估和原位DC定量。无论评估时间和粘结策略如何,SBU和CSE均显示出显著更高的平均µTBS和更低的纳米渗漏。XEN-SE的转化率最低。因此,通用型粘结剂与牙本质的粘结性能取决于材料,无论粘结策略如何,XEN的性能均显著低于SBU。