School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, War Memorial Gymnasium, Room 122, 6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Curr Obes Rep. 2019 Dec;8(4):341-353. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00366-w.
In this review, we critically examined recent evidence pertaining to the efficacy of peer-delivered physical activity interventions.
Peer-delivered interventions appear to represent an efficacious, although under-utilized, means of promoting health-enhancing physical activity, among diverse populations across the lifespan, and in different settings. Nevertheless, research has largely failed to identify the salient behaviors/strategies of peer leaders that can promote behavior change among target populations, as well as explanatory mechanisms (i.e., mediators) of intervention effects. Balanced against recent evidence for the efficacy of peer-delivered interventions to promote physical activity, work in this area appears impeded by an absence of peer-centric explanatory frameworks and theory that may optimize both intervention delivery and efficacy/effectiveness.
在本次综述中,我们批判性地审查了最近关于同伴提供的体育活动干预效果的证据。
同伴提供的干预措施似乎是一种有效的手段,尽管尚未得到充分利用,但可以在整个生命周期中、在不同环境中促进有益于健康的体育活动,在不同人群中都有效果。然而,研究基本上未能确定同伴领导者可以促进目标人群行为改变的突出行为/策略,以及干预效果的解释机制(即中介因素)。与最近关于同伴提供的干预措施促进体育活动的有效性的证据相比,该领域的工作似乎受到缺乏以同伴为中心的解释框架和理论的阻碍,这些框架和理论可以优化干预的提供和有效性/效果。