Suppr超能文献

守门员动作似任务中不同学习和情境干扰的短期效应:视动反应时和运动控制。

Short-term effects of differential learning and contextual interference in a goalkeeper-like task: Visuomotor response time and motor control.

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Faculty of Applied Engineering, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Sep;20(8):1061-1071. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1696894. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Abstract

In this experiment, we compared changes in visuomotor performance and motor control after a single session of differential learning (DL) and contextual interference (CI) in a reaching task to mimic goalkeeping. Subjects (n = n = 16) stood in front of a wall with six LED-light targets that flashed on in a random order and subjects had to move their hand in front of it as fast as possible in order to extinguish the target. After the pre-test subjects followed a DL or CI training session, followed immediately by a post-test, followed by one hour of rest and a retention test. Performance and motor control were measured respectively by visuomotor response time (VMRT) and an Index of Motor Abundance (IMA; reflecting the strength of movement synergies) calculated with Uncontrolled Manifold analysis. A mixed-effects Bayesian ANOVA model was used to evaluate differences in changes in both parameters between both training groups. Averaged over the six targets, the decrease in VMRT was stronger for DL than CI at the post-test (interference effect) but not at retention. The IMA was on average increased at post- and retention test in both groups, indicating stronger synergies between the degrees-of-freedom. While the ANOVA for IMA was not conclusive, the changes were likely not different between both learning methods. Thus, while an interference effect was found for CI but not DL in terms of performance on the task, no such effect was observed on the behavioural level in terms of the strength of movement synergies.

摘要

在本实验中,我们比较了在模拟守门员任务的单次距离学习(DL)和情境干扰(CI)后,视动表现和运动控制的变化。实验对象(n=16)站在一堵墙前,墙上有六个 LED 灯目标,它们会随机闪烁,实验对象必须尽快将手移到它前面以将其熄灭。在预测试后,实验对象分别进行了 DL 或 CI 训练,随后立即进行了后测试,接着休息了一个小时,然后进行了保留测试。视动反应时间(VMRT)和运动丰富度指数(IMA;反映运动协同作用的强度)分别用于测量运动表现和运动控制,IMA 是通过非控制流形分析计算得出的。使用混合效应贝叶斯方差分析模型来评估这两种训练方法在两种参数变化上的差异。在六个目标的平均值上,DL 在 post-test 时比 CI 更能降低 VMRT(干扰效应),但在保留测试时没有。在 post-test 和保留测试中,两组的 IMA 平均值均增加,这表明自由度之间的协同作用更强。虽然 IMA 的 ANOVA 没有定论,但两种学习方法之间的变化可能没有差异。因此,虽然在任务表现方面发现了 CI 的干扰效应,但在运动协同作用的强度方面,DL 则没有这种效应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验