Del Rey P, Liu X, Simpson K J
Department of Physical Education and Sport Studies, University of Georgia, Athens.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1994 Jun;65(2):120-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1994.10607606.
Two unique methodological strategies were used to investigate the influence of retroactive inhibition on recall within a contextual interference paradigm. Three independent blocked groups, blocked without retroactive inhibition (BL-without), blocked with 18 trials of retroactive inhibition (BL-18), and blocked with 36 trials of retroactive inhibition (BL-36), were created that varied in order of presentation of tasks. By testing a single task in retention and creating three independent blocked groups, varying amounts of retroactive inhibition were produced. This isolated the effects of retroactive inhibition on blocked compared to control and random subjects' retention. The Acquisition Group x Retention Trials interaction indicated that random and BL-without subjects had shorter reaction time than BL-18 and BL-36 subjects. Thus, blocked subjects with retroactive inhibition exhibited a retention deficit compared to BL-without subjects. The results support previous contextual interference findings and suggest that retroactive inhibition influences the retention deficits demonstrated by blocked compared to random subjects in typical contextual interference investigations.
在情境干扰范式下，采用了两种独特的方法策略来研究倒摄抑制对回忆的影响。创建了三个独立的分组组，即无倒摄抑制的分组（BL-无）、有18次倒摄抑制试验的分组（BL-18）和有36次倒摄抑制试验的分组（BL-36），它们在任务呈现顺序上有所不同。通过在保持阶段测试单个任务并创建三个独立的分组组，产生了不同程度的倒摄抑制。这分离了倒摄抑制对分组组与对照组和随机组被试保持的影响。习得组×保持试验的交互作用表明，随机组和BL-无组被试的反应时间比BL-18组和BL-36组被试短。因此，与BL-无组被试相比，有倒摄抑制的分组组被试表现出保持缺陷。这些结果支持了先前情境干扰的研究发现，并表明在典型的情境干扰研究中，与随机组被试相比，倒摄抑制会影响分组组被试所表现出的保持缺陷。
