Wilkerson Gary B, Simpson Kevin A, Clark Ryan A
J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Jan;26(1):26-34. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0068. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Neurocognitive reaction time has been associated with musculoskeletal injury risk, but visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) derived from tests that present greater challenges to visual stimulus detection and motor response execution may have a stronger association.
To assess VMRT as a predictor of injury and the extent to which improvement may result from VMRT training.
Cohort study.
University athletic performance center.
76 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division-I FCS football players (19.5 ± 1.4 y, 1.85 ± 0.06 m, 102.98 ± 19.06 kg).
Preparticipation and postseason assessments. A subset of players who exhibited slowest VMRT in relation to the cohort's postseason median value participated in a 6-wk training program.
Injury occurrence was related to preparticipation VMRT, which was represented by both number of target hits in 60 s and average elapsed time between hits (ms). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified the optimum cut point for a binary injury risk classification. A nonparametric repeated-measures analysis of ranks procedure was used to compare posttraining VMRT values for slow players who completed at least half of the training sessions (n = 15) with those for untrained fast players (n = 27).
A preparticipation cut point of ≤85 hits (≥705 ms) discriminated injured from noninjured players with odds ratio = 2.30 (90% confidence interval, 1.05-5.06). Slow players who completed the training exhibited significant improvement in visuomotor performance compared with baseline (standardized response mean = 2.53), whereas untrained players exhibited a small performance decrement (group × trial interaction effect, L = 28.74; P < .001).
Slow VMRT appears to be an important and modifiable injury risk factor for college football players. More research is needed to refine visuomotor reaction-time screening and training methods and to determine the extent to which improved performance values can reduce injury incidence.
神经认知反应时间与肌肉骨骼损伤风险相关,但源自对视觉刺激检测和运动反应执行提出更大挑战的测试的视觉运动反应时间(VMRT)可能具有更强的相关性。
评估VMRT作为损伤预测指标以及VMRT训练可能带来的改善程度。
队列研究。
大学运动表现中心。
76名美国国家大学体育协会第一分区FCS橄榄球运动员(19.5±1.4岁,1.85±0.06米,102.98±19.06千克)。
赛季前和赛季后的评估。与队列赛季后中位数相比VMRT最慢的一部分运动员参加了为期6周的训练计划。
损伤发生情况与赛季前VMRT相关,VMRT由60秒内的目标命中次数和命中之间的平均经过时间(毫秒)表示。受试者工作特征分析确定了二元损伤风险分类的最佳切点。采用非参数重复测量秩分析程序,比较完成至少一半训练课程的慢运动员(n = 15)训练后的VMRT值与未训练的快运动员(n = 27)的VMRT值。
赛季前切点≤85次命中(≥705毫秒)可区分受伤和未受伤运动员,优势比=2.30(90%置信区间,1.05 - 5.06)。完成训练的慢运动员与基线相比,视觉运动表现有显著改善(标准化反应均值 = 2.53),而未训练的运动员表现略有下降(组×试验交互效应,L = 28.74;P <.001)。
VMRT慢似乎是大学橄榄球运动员重要且可改变的损伤风险因素。需要更多研究来完善视觉运动反应时间筛查和训练方法,并确定性能值的改善能在多大程度上降低损伤发生率。