Laboratory of Clinical Biomechanics, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Service of Physical Therapy, Hospital Clínico La Florida, Santiago, Chile.
Laboratory of Clinical Biomechanics, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile; Biomechanics and Kinesiology Laboratory, Service of Physical Therapy, San José Hospital, Santiago, Chile; Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Med Hypotheses. 2020 Feb;135:109474. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109474. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
Grip and pinch strength are relevant functional variables for various activities of daily life and are related to the quality of life of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
The main aim was to analyze the relationship between grip and pinch strength and the educational level in women with CTS.
Cross-sectional study.
Thirty-one female patients with CTS awaiting surgery were assigned to the low education group if they only had primary education level (completed or not) and the high education group for those having higher education level. The assessments included: grip strength, pinch strength, Visual Analogue Scale, Quick DASH Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia.
A statistically significant difference was obtained for grip strength (p = 0.027), pinch strength (p = 0.002) and catastrophizing (p = 0.038) between the two groups. No significant differences were observed for the other variables studied (p < 0.05). Grip strength was not related to individual factors: type of work, age, body mass index.
CTS patients with a low educational level exhibited reduced grip and pinch strength and more catastrophic thinking. Future studies should investigate the mechanisms involved in the loss of strength in patients with lower educational levels.
握力和捏力是日常生活中各种活动的相关功能变量,与腕管综合征(CTS)患者的生活质量有关。
主要目的是分析握力和捏力与女性 CTS 患者教育水平之间的关系。
横断面研究。
将 31 名等待手术的女性 CTS 患者分为低教育组(仅完成或未完成小学教育水平)和高教育组(具有更高教育水平)。评估包括:握力、捏力、视觉模拟量表、快速 DASH 问卷、疼痛灾难化量表和坦帕运动恐惧量表。
两组间握力(p=0.027)、捏力(p=0.002)和灾难化(p=0.038)存在统计学差异。其他研究变量无显著差异(p<0.05)。握力与个体因素无关:工作类型、年龄、体重指数。
教育程度较低的 CTS 患者握力和捏力下降,灾难化思维更多。未来的研究应探讨涉及教育程度较低患者力量丧失的机制。