School of Water Conservancy & Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China; Key Laboratory of Effective Utilization of Agricultural Water Resources of Ministry of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China; Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Water Conservancy Engineering in Cold Region, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150030, China.
School of Water Conservancy & Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133732. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133732. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Currently, little is known about soil improvement by biochar in seasonally frozen soil areas. It is not clear whether the effects of biochar application on soil physical properties differ based on application period. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of biochar on soil structure and water retention in cold regions during different application periods. Three biochar applications during different periods were set up through field trials (A: in the early stage of freezing, B: in the middle period of thawing and C: addition of half of the biochar in the early stage of freezing and other half in the middle period of thawing), including four biochar application rates (3, 6, 9 and 12 kg·m), and no biochar was applied as a control (CK). The results showed that the selection of the biochar application period had a significant effect on the soil structure, but there was no significant difference in the stability of the soil structure. Biochar significantly increased the total porosity (TP) and the content of aggregates with diameters >0.25 mm in the soil, and all 9 kg·m biochar treatments showed the best structural stability index. The improvement of the soil structure led to the enhancement of the water storage capacities. The plant available water content (PAWC) increased from 0.0638 to 0.0927-0.1767 cm·cm, and this result was significantly related to the increases in soil TP and large aggregates (LAs: >2 mm). The optimum field capacity (FC = 0.372 cm·cm) was obtained when the applied amount was 9 kg·m. This was beneficial for the stable storage of soil moisture. However, compared with the CK, none of the treatments in area B increased the liquid water content in the field soil. In summary, we suggest that treatment C9 is the most suitable method for application in seasonally frozen soil areas.
目前,人们对季节性冻土区生物炭改良土壤的了解甚少。尚不清楚生物炭的施用对土壤物理性质的影响是否因施用期而异。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同施用期生物炭对寒区土壤结构和水分保持的影响。通过田间试验设置了三个生物炭施用期(A:冻结初期,B:解冻中期,C:冻结初期添加一半生物炭,解冻中期添加另一半),包括四个生物炭施用量(3、6、9 和 12 kg·m),不施生物炭作为对照(CK)。结果表明,生物炭施用期的选择对土壤结构有显著影响,但土壤结构稳定性没有显著差异。生物炭显著增加了土壤总孔隙度(TP)和直径>0.25mm的团聚体含量,所有 9kg·m 生物炭处理的结构稳定性指数最好。土壤结构的改善导致了持水能力的提高。有效水含量(PAWC)从 0.0638cm·cm 增加到 0.0927-0.1767cm·cm,这一结果与土壤 TP 和大团聚体(LAs:>2mm)的增加显著相关。当施用量为 9kg·m 时,田间持水量(FC=0.372cm·cm)最佳,有利于土壤水分的稳定储存。然而,与 CK 相比,B 区的处理均未增加田间土壤的液态水含量。综上所述,我们建议 C9 处理是季节性冻土区最适宜的施用方法。