Maré Annelies De, Verhulst Anja, Cavalier Etienne, Delanaye Pierre, Behets Geert J, Meijers Bjorn, Kuypers Dirk, D'Haese Patrick C, Evenepoel Pieter
Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, Domaine du Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 20;8(12):2027. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122027.
Mounting evidence indicates that sclerostin, a well-known inhibitor of bone formation, may qualify as a clinically relevant biomarker of chronic kidney disease-related mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD), including abnormal mineral and bone metabolism and extraskeletal calcification. For this purpose, in this study we investigate the extent to which circulating sclerostin, skeletal sclerostin expression, bone histomorphometric parameters, and serum markers of bone metabolism associate with each other. Bone biopsies and serum samples were collected in a cohort of 68 end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Serum sclerostin levels were measured using 4 different commercially available assays. Skeletal sclerostin expression was evaluated on immunohistochemically stained bone sections. Quantitative bone histomorphometry was performed on Goldner stained tissue sections. Different serum markers of bone metabolism were analyzed using in-house techniques or commercially available assays. Despite large inter-assay differences for circulating sclerostin, results obtained with the 4 assays under study closely correlated with each other, whilst moderate significant correlations with skeletal sclerostin expression were also found. Both skeletal and circulating sclerostin negatively correlated with histomorphometric bone and serum parameters reflecting bone formation and turnover. In this study, the unique combined evaluation of bone sclerostin expression, bone histomorphometry, bone biomarkers, and serum sclerostin levels, as assessed by 4 different assays, demonstrated that sclerostin may qualify as a clinically relevant marker of disturbed bone metabolism in ESKD patients.
越来越多的证据表明,硬化素作为一种知名的骨形成抑制剂,可能有资格成为慢性肾脏病相关矿物质和骨异常(CKD-MBD)的临床相关生物标志物,包括矿物质和骨代谢异常以及骨外钙化。为此,在本研究中,我们调查了循环硬化素、骨骼硬化素表达、骨组织形态计量学参数和骨代谢血清标志物之间的关联程度。我们收集了68例终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的骨活检样本和血清样本。使用4种不同的商业可用检测方法测量血清硬化素水平。在免疫组织化学染色的骨切片上评估骨骼硬化素的表达。对戈德纳染色的组织切片进行定量骨组织形态计量学分析。使用内部技术或商业可用检测方法分析不同的骨代谢血清标志物。尽管循环硬化素的检测间差异很大,但所研究的4种检测方法获得的结果彼此密切相关,同时也发现与骨骼硬化素表达存在中度显著相关性。骨骼和循环硬化素均与反映骨形成和骨转换的组织形态计量学骨参数和血清参数呈负相关。在本研究中,通过4种不同检测方法评估的骨硬化素表达、骨组织形态计量学、骨生物标志物和血清硬化素水平的独特联合评估表明,硬化素可能有资格作为ESKD患者骨代谢紊乱的临床相关标志物。