• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

份量大小会透过社会消费规范影响后续食物摄取量。

Served Portion Sizes Affect Later Food Intake Through Social Consumption Norms.

机构信息

Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles Group, Wageningen University and Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Nov 20;11(12):2845. doi: 10.3390/nu11122845.

DOI:10.3390/nu11122845
PMID:31757067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6949930/
Abstract

Portion sizes of commercially available foods have increased, and there is evidence that exposure to portion sizes recalibrates what is perceived as 'normal' and subsequently, how much food is selected and consumed. The present study aims to explore the role of social (descriptive and injunctive) and personal portion size norms in this effect. Across two experiments, participants were either visually exposed to (Study 1, = 329) or actually served (Study 2, = 132) a smaller or larger than normal food portion. After 24 h, participants reported their intended consumption (Study 1) or served themselves and consumed (Study 2) a portion of that food and reported perceived portion size norms. In Study 1, visual exposure to portion size did not significantly affect intended consumption and perceived portion size norms. In Study 2, participants consumed a smaller portion of food when they were served a smaller rather than a larger portion the previous day, which was mediated by perceived descriptive and injunctive social (but not personal) portion size norms. Results suggest that being served (but not mere visual exposure to) smaller (relative to larger) portions changes perceived social norms about portion size and this may reduce future consumption of that food.

摘要

商业销售的食物份量增加了,有证据表明,接触到的食物份量会重新调整人们对“正常”份量的认知,进而影响人们选择和食用的食物量。本研究旨在探讨社会(描述性和规范性)和个人份量规范在这种影响中的作用。在两项实验中,参与者要么(研究 1,n = 329)直接看到或实际食用(研究 2,n = 132)较小或较大份量的食物。24 小时后,参与者报告他们的预期摄入量(研究 1)或自行选择和食用(研究 2)该食物的一部分,并报告感知到的份量规范。在研究 1 中,视觉上接触到的份量大小并未显著影响预期摄入量和感知到的份量规范。在研究 2 中,与前一天食用较大份量相比,参与者在当天食用较小份量的食物,这是由感知到的描述性和规范性社会(但非个人)份量规范介导的。结果表明,与较大份量相比,提供较小份量(而非仅仅是视觉上接触到较小份量)会改变人们对份量规范的感知,这可能会减少对该食物的未来消费。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d3/6949930/6dd0561ea912/nutrients-11-02845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d3/6949930/1a44b62568d0/nutrients-11-02845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d3/6949930/6dd0561ea912/nutrients-11-02845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d3/6949930/1a44b62568d0/nutrients-11-02845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04d3/6949930/6dd0561ea912/nutrients-11-02845-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Served Portion Sizes Affect Later Food Intake Through Social Consumption Norms.份量大小会透过社会消费规范影响后续食物摄取量。
Nutrients. 2019 Nov 20;11(12):2845. doi: 10.3390/nu11122845.
2
Visual exposure to large and small portion sizes and perceptions of portion size normality: Three experimental studies.视觉暴露于不同大小的食物分量以及对食物分量正常性的认知:三项实验研究
Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
3
Reductions to main meal portion sizes reduce daily energy intake regardless of perceived normality of portion size: a 5 day cross-over laboratory experiment.减少主餐份量会减少每日的能量摄入,而不论对份量大小的感知是否正常:一项为期 5 天的交叉实验室实验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 12;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0920-4.
4
Portion size normality and additional within-meal food intake: two crossover laboratory experiments.份量正常和额外的餐内进食:两项交叉实验室实验。
Br J Nutr. 2020 Feb 28;123(4):462-471. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519002307. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Personal and social norms for food portion sizes in lean and obese adults.瘦成年人与肥胖成年人食物份量的个人及社会规范。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Aug;39(8):1319-24. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.47. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
6
Portion size and later food intake: evidence on the "normalizing" effect of reducing food portion sizes.份量大小与后续食物摄取量:减少食物份量大小的「正常化」效应之证据。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr 1;107(4):640-646. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy013.
7
Do perceived norms of social media users' eating habits and preferences predict our own food consumption and BMI?社交媒体用户饮食习惯和偏好的感知规范是否能预测我们自己的食物消费和 BMI?
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104611. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104611. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
8
The effect of a portion size intervention on French fries consumption, plate waste, satiety and compensatory caloric intake: an on-campus restaurant experiment.一份量干预对法式炸薯条消费、餐盘浪费、饱腹感和补偿性热量摄入的影响:校园餐厅实验。
Nutr J. 2018 Apr 13;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0352-z.
9
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
10
How big is too big? A qualitative study of discretionary food portion size norms among Australian consumers.多大算大?澳大利亚消费者对随意食物份量规范的定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 24;27(1):e242. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001964.

引用本文的文献

1
Can (dynamic) social norms encourage plant-based food purchases? a quasi-experimental study in real-world Dutch supermarkets.动态社会规范能否促进植物性食品的购买?一项在荷兰现实超市中的准实验研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Mar 11;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03986-3.
2
FODMAP Content Like-by-like Comparison in Spanish Gluten-free and Gluten-containing Cereal-based Products.西班牙无麸质和含麸质谷物制品中 FODMAP 内容的类似比较。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2024 Jun;79(2):545-550. doi: 10.1007/s11130-024-01177-8. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
3
Development and validation of an online tool to assess perceived portion size norms of discretionary foods.

本文引用的文献

1
When a portion becomes a norm: Exposure to a smaller vs. larger portion of food affects later food intake.当一部分成为常态时:接触较少或较多份量的食物会影响之后的食物摄入量。
Food Qual Prefer. 2019 Jul;75:113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.013.
2
The effects of mindful eating on food consumption over a half-day period.正念饮食对半天内食物摄入量的影响。
Appetite. 2020 Feb 1;145:104495. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104495. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
The effectiveness of a social media intervention for reducing portion sizes in young adults and adolescents.
开发和验证一种在线工具,以评估可自由支配食品的感知份量规范。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Aug;77(8):815-822. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01290-y. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Exposure to images showing (non)adherence to physical distancing rules: Effect on adherence behavior and perceived social norms.接触显示(不)遵守保持身体距离规则的图像:对遵守行为和感知社会规范的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276936. eCollection 2022.
5
Downsizing food: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of reducing served food portion sizes on daily energy intake and body weight.缩小食物份量:系统评价和荟萃分析考察减少供应食物份量对每日能量摄入和体重的影响。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Mar 14;129(5):888-903. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522000903. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
6
Impact of decreasing the proportion of higher energy foods and reducing portion sizes on food purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.减少高能量食品比例和减少份量对工作场所自助餐厅购买食品的影响:一项阶梯式随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 14;18(9):e1003743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003743. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.分量控制工具对分量大小意识、选择和摄入的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 9;13(6):1978. doi: 10.3390/nu13061978.
8
That's My Cue to Eat: A Systematic Review of the Persuasiveness of Front-of-Pack Cues on Food Packages for Children vs. Adults.这是我进食的信号:关于食品包装上的前置标签对儿童和成人的吸引力的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 11;12(4):1062. doi: 10.3390/nu12041062.
一种用于减少年轻人和青少年食物份量的社交媒体干预措施的效果。
Digit Health. 2019 Sep 22;5:2055207619878076. doi: 10.1177/2055207619878076. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Identifying social norms in physical aspects of food environments: A photo study.识别食物环境中物理方面的社会规范:一项照片研究。
Appetite. 2019 Dec 1;143:104414. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104414. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
A smartphone based attentive eating intervention for energy intake and weight loss: results from a randomised controlled trial.基于智能手机的专注进食干预对能量摄入和体重减轻的影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 21;19(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6923-x.
6
Potential moderators of the portion size effect.部分大小效应的潜在调节因素。
Physiol Behav. 2019 May 15;204:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.043. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
New recommendations for testing indirect effects in mediational models: The need to report and test component paths.中介模型中间接效应检验的新建议:报告和检验组成路径的必要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Dec;115(6):929-943. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000132.
8
Portion size and later food intake: evidence on the "normalizing" effect of reducing food portion sizes.份量大小与后续食物摄取量:减少食物份量大小的「正常化」效应之证据。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr 1;107(4):640-646. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy013.
9
The potential of peer social norms to shape food intake in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review of effects and moderators.同伴社会规范对青少年和年轻人食物摄入量的影响潜力:效应和调节因素的系统评价
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;10(3):326-40. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1155161. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
Visual exposure to large and small portion sizes and perceptions of portion size normality: Three experimental studies.视觉暴露于不同大小的食物分量以及对食物分量正常性的认知:三项实验研究
Appetite. 2016 Mar 1;98:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 17.