Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nutr J. 2018 Apr 13;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0352-z.
One of the driving factors of dietary overconsumption throughout the last decennia is the increase of food portion sizes. Larger portions induce higher daily energy intake, so reducing portion size may reduce intake of excess calories. However, real-life studies about the effects of portion size reduction are lacking. Therefore, this study examined the effect of a French fries portion size reduction on French fries consumption, French fries plate waste, satiety and caloric intake during the subsequent afternoon among university students and employees in a Belgian on-campus restaurant setting. Moreover, this study evaluated consumers' perception about the portion size reduction.
The study took place over a two-time (i.e. baseline and intervention week) 4-day period (Tuesday-Friday) in the on-campus restaurant where ±1200 meals are served every day. French fries' portions were reduced by 20% by replacing the usual porcelain bowl served during the baseline week (±200 g) with smaller volume paper bags during the intervention week (±159 g) in a pre-post real-life experiment. French fries consumption and plate waste were measured in 2056 consumers at baseline and 2175 consumers at intervention. Additionally, interviews were conducted directly after lunch and again between 4 and 6 p.m. on the same day to assess satiety and caloric intake at pre and post in a small subsample of both French fries consumers (n = 19) and non-French fries consumers (n = 14). Post-intervention, the same subsample was interviewed about their perception of the portion size reduction (n = 28).
Total French fries intake decreased by 9.1%, and total plate waste decreased by 66.4%. No differences were found in satiety or caloric intake between baseline and intervention week among the French fries' consumers. The majority (n = 24, 86%) of French fries consumers noticed the reduction in portion size during the intervention. Although most participants (n = 19, 68%) perceived the reduced portion size as sufficient, only a minority of participants (n = 9, 32%) indicated post-intervention that they would agree with a permanent implementation.
Reducing portion size may lead to reduced caloric intake, without changing perceived levels of satiety.
在过去几十年中,饮食过度消费的一个驱动因素是食物份量的增加。较大的份量会导致每天摄入的能量更高,因此减少份量可能会减少过量卡路里的摄入。然而,现实生活中关于减少份量的影响的研究还很缺乏。因此,本研究在比利时大学校园餐厅环境中,考察了减少炸薯条份量对大学生和员工的炸薯条消费、炸薯条盘浪费、饱腹感和下午卡路里摄入的影响。此外,本研究还评估了消费者对份量减少的看法。
本研究在一个为期四天的时间内(星期二至星期五)进行了两次(即基线和干预周),在校园餐厅内进行,该餐厅每天供应±1200 餐。通过将基线周期间通常使用的瓷碗(±200 克)替换为干预周期间较小体积的纸袋,将炸薯条份量减少 20%,进行了预-后现实生活实验。在基线时测量了 2056 名消费者的炸薯条消费和盘内浪费,在干预时测量了 2175 名消费者的炸薯条消费和盘内浪费。此外,在同一天的午餐后和下午 4 点至 6 点之间直接进行了访谈,以评估小样本中炸薯条消费者(n=19)和非炸薯条消费者(n=14)的预-后饱腹感和卡路里摄入。在干预后,对同一小样本进行了关于他们对份量减少的看法的访谈(n=28)。
总炸薯条摄入量减少了 9.1%,总盘内浪费减少了 66.4%。在炸薯条消费者中,基线和干预周之间的饱腹感或卡路里摄入没有差异。大多数(n=24,86%)炸薯条消费者在干预期间注意到份量减少。尽管大多数参与者(n=19,68%)认为减少的份量足够,但只有少数参与者(n=9,32%)表示在干预后他们会同意永久实施。
减少份量可能会导致卡路里摄入量减少,而不会改变饱腹感。