Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZA, Liverpool, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 12;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0920-4.
Smaller portions may help to reduce energy intake. However, there may be a limit to the magnitude of the portion size reduction that can be made before consumers respond by increasing intake of other food immediately or at later meals. We tested the theoretical prediction that reductions to portion size would result in a significant reduction to daily energy intake when the resulting portion was visually perceived as 'normal' in size, but that a reduction resulting in a 'smaller than normal' portion size would cause immediate or later additional eating.
Over three 5-day periods, daily energy intake was measured in a controlled laboratory study using a randomized crossover design (N = 30). The served portion size of the main meal component of lunch and dinner was manipulated in three conditions: 'large-normal' (747 kcal), 'small-normal' (543 kcal), and 'smaller than normal' (339 kcal). Perceived 'normality' of portion sizes was determined by two pilot studies. Ad libitum daily energy intake from all meals and snacks was measured.
Daily energy intake in the 'large-normal' condition was 2543 kcals. Daily energy intake was significantly lower in the 'small-normal' portion size condition (mean difference - 95 kcal/d, 95% CI [- 184, - 6], p = .04); and was also significantly lower in the 'smaller than normal' than the 'small-normal' condition (mean difference - 210 kcal/d, 95% CI [- 309, - 111], p < .001). Contrary to predictions, there was no evidence that the degree of additional food consumption observed was greater when portions were reduced past the point of appearing normal in size.
Reductions to the portion size of main-meal foods resulted in significant decreases in daily energy intake. Additional food consumption did not offset this effect, even when portions were reduced to the point that they were no longer perceived as being normal in size.
Prospectively registered protocol and analysis plan: https://osf.io/natws/; retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811210.
较小的份量可能有助于减少能量摄入。然而,在消费者通过立即增加其他食物的摄入或以其他方式在之后的餐点中进行补偿之前,可能存在份量大小可以减少的幅度限制。我们测试了这样一种理论预测,即当所得到的份量在视觉上被认为是正常大小时,份量的减少将导致每日能量摄入的显著减少,但如果减少导致的份量小于正常大小,则会导致即时或之后的额外进食。
在一项使用随机交叉设计的对照实验室研究中,在三个 5 天的时间内测量每日能量摄入(N=30)。午餐和晚餐的主餐份量在三种情况下进行了处理:“大-正常”(747 千卡)、“小-正常”(543 千卡)和“小-异常”(339 千卡)。通过两项试点研究确定份量大小的感知“正常性”。测量所有餐点和零食的自由摄入的每日能量。
“大-正常”条件下的每日能量摄入为 2543 千卡。“小-正常”份量条件下的每日能量摄入显著较低(平均差异-95 千卡/天,95%CI[-184,-6],p=0.04);与“小-正常”相比,“小-异常”条件下的每日能量摄入也显著较低(平均差异-210 千卡/天,95%CI[-309,-111],p<0.001)。与预测相反,当份量减少到不再被视为正常大小时,并没有证据表明观察到的额外食物消耗程度更大。
主餐食物份量的减少导致每日能量摄入的显著减少。即使份量减少到不再被视为正常大小,额外的食物消耗也没有抵消这种效果。
前瞻性注册的方案和分析计划:https://osf.io/natws/;回顾性注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811210。