Suppr超能文献

黑素瘤病理学报告和分期。

Melanoma pathology reporting and staging.

机构信息

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2020 Jan;33(Suppl 1):15-24. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0402-x. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

Abstract

The pathological diagnosis of melanoma can be challenging. The provision of an appropriate biopsy and pertinent history can assist in establishing an accurate diagnosis and reliable estimate of prognosis. In their reports, pathologists should document both the criteria on which the diagnosis was based as well as important prognostic parameters. For melanoma, such prognostic parameters include tumor thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, neurotropism, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Disease staging is important for risk stratifying melanoma patients into prognostic groups and patient management recommendations are often stage based. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Melanoma Staging System was implemented in 2018 and several important changes were made. Tumor thickness and ulceration remain the key T category criteria. T1b melanomas were redefined as either ulcerated melanomas <1.0 mm thick or nonulcerated melanomas 0.8-1.0 mm thick. Although mitotic rate was removed as a T category criterion in the 8th edition, it remains a very important prognostic factor and should continue to be documented in primary melanoma pathology reports. It was also recommended in the 8th edition that tumor thickness be recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm (rather than the nearest 0.01 mm). In the future, incorporation of additional prognostic parameters beyond those utilized in the current version of the staging system into (web based) prognostic models/clinical tools will likely facilitate more personalized prognostic estimates. Evaluation of molecular markers of prognosis is an active area of current research; however, additional data are needed before it would be appropriate to recommend use of such tests in routine clinical practice.

摘要

黑色素瘤的病理诊断具有一定挑战性。提供适当的活检和相关病史有助于做出准确的诊断和可靠的预后评估。病理学家在报告中应记录诊断依据的标准以及重要的预后参数。对于黑色素瘤,这些预后参数包括肿瘤厚度、溃疡、有丝分裂率、血管淋巴管浸润、神经趋向性和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞。疾病分期对于将黑色素瘤患者分层为预后组并进行风险分层非常重要,患者管理建议通常基于分期。第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)黑色素瘤分期系统于 2018 年实施,其中进行了一些重要的修改。肿瘤厚度和溃疡仍然是关键的 T 分类标准。T1b 黑色素瘤重新定义为厚度<1.0mm 的溃疡型黑色素瘤或厚度为 0.8-1.0mm 的非溃疡型黑色素瘤。尽管在第八版中,有丝分裂率已不再作为 T 分类标准,但它仍然是一个非常重要的预后因素,应继续在原发性黑色素瘤病理报告中记录。第八版还建议将肿瘤厚度记录到最接近的 0.1mm(而不是最接近的 0.01mm)。未来,将分期系统当前版本中使用的预后参数以外的其他预后参数纳入(基于网络的)预后模型/临床工具,可能有助于更个体化的预后评估。预后分子标志物的评估是当前研究的活跃领域;然而,在推荐此类检测在常规临床实践中的应用之前,还需要更多的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验