Department of Pharmacy, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
Analytical Pharmacology, Meijo University Graduate School of Pharmacy, Nagoya, Japan.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Dec;19(12):1275-1281. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13796. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
To analyze the impact of clinical medication reviews (CMR) on reducing unplanned hospitalizations owing to polypharmacy among older adults using an intervention.
Our meta-analysis complied with PRISMA guidelines. The literature review comprised a search for articles published between January 1972 and March 2017 on MEDLINE and Google Scholar. We identified randomized controlled trials focusing on CMR that evaluated unplanned hospitalization and re-hospitalization among older adults as a primary outcome. The keywords used were "CMR" or "medication review" in their titles, and the phrases "elderly" or "older adults" or "geriatric" and "polypharmacy." The randomized controlled trials selected were divided according to the three types of CMR to analyze the characteristics of each review.
We included nine randomized controlled trials that examined the impact of CMR of polypharmacy in older patients. Five trials corresponded to CMR type I (prescription only review) or II (adherence review), whereas four corresponded to type III (comprehensive clinical evaluation for disease management). Type I/II increased the number of unplanned hospitalizations (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.38, P = 0.002), whereas type III decreased hospital admissions (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.95, P = 0.001).
The present findings show the need for an intervention standardization for CMR, particularly for type III in older adults with polypharmacy, to decrease hospitalizations. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1275-1281.
通过干预措施,分析临床药物审查(CMR)对减少老年人因多种药物治疗而导致的非计划性住院的影响。
我们的荟萃分析符合 PRISMA 指南。文献综述包括对 1972 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月间 MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 上发表的文章进行搜索。我们确定了专注于 CMR 的随机对照试验,这些试验将非计划性住院和老年人再次住院作为主要结果进行评估。标题中使用的关键词是“CMR”或“药物审查”,以及“老年人”或“老年人”或“老年”和“多种药物治疗”等短语。选择的随机对照试验根据三种 CMR 类型进行了分类,以分析每种审查的特点。
我们纳入了 9 项研究,评估了 CMR 对老年患者多种药物治疗的影响。5 项试验对应于 CMR 类型 I(仅审查处方)或 II(评估药物依从性),而 4 项试验对应于类型 III(疾病管理的全面临床评估)。I/II 型增加了非计划性住院的数量(RR 1.22,95%CI 1.07-1.38,P = 0.002),而 III 型则减少了住院人数(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.79-0.95,P = 0.001)。
目前的研究结果表明,需要对 CMR 进行干预标准化,特别是对于患有多种药物治疗的老年人,应采用 III 型 CMR,以减少住院治疗。老年医学与老年病学国际 2019;19:1275-1281.