Rocky Mountain Ear Center, 601 E. Hampden Ave #430, Englewood, CO 80113, United States of America.
Rocky Mountain Ear Center, 601 E. Hampden Ave #430, Englewood, CO 80113, United States of America.
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Mar-Apr;41(2):102300. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102300. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
To comprehensively assess and describe functional auditory performance in a group of adults with bilateral, moderate sloping to profound sensorineural hearing loss who were dissatisfied users of well-fit bilateral hearing aids and presented for Cochlear implant evaluation. Participants were evaluated with bilateral hearing aids and after six months of bimodal (Cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid) hearing experience with a Cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid.
Study participants were assessed using pure tone audiometry, aided speech understanding in quiet (CNC words) and in noise (AzBio sentences at +10 and +5 dB SNR) in the sound field with unilateral and bilateral hearing aids fit to target. Participants completed subjective scales of quality of life, (Health Utilities Index Mark 3), hearing disability, (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) and a device use satisfaction scale. Participants ≥55 years were administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening tool. One-hundred enrolled individuals completed baseline evaluations.
Aided bilateral mean speech understanding scores were 28% for CNC words and 31%, and 17% for AzBio sentences at a +10 dB, and +5 dB SNR, respectively. Mean scale ratings were 0.46 for overall quality of life and 3.19 for functional hearing ability. Ninety percent of participants reported dissatisfaction with overall hearing performance.
Evaluation results, including functional performance metrics quantifying the deleterious effects of hearing loss for overall wellbeing, underscore that bilateral hearing aids are not an effective treatment for individuals with bilateral, moderate sloping to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Individuals with this degree of hearing impairment, who demonstrate poor aided speech understanding and dissatisfaction with hearing abilities in everyday life, require timely referral to a Cochlear implant clinic for further evaluation.
全面评估和描述一组双侧中度至重度感音神经性听力损失、双侧佩戴助听器但效果不佳的成年人的功能性听觉表现,并对其进行人工耳蜗植入评估。参与者在双侧佩戴助听器并在接受六个月的双耳(人工耳蜗和对侧助听器)听力体验后,用人工耳蜗和对侧助听器进行评估。
使用纯音测听、安静环境下的助听言语理解(CNC 词)和噪声环境下的助听言语理解(AzBio 句子,+10 和+5dB SNR)评估研究参与者,双侧助听器根据目标值进行适配。参与者完成生活质量主观量表(健康效用指数标记 3)、听力障碍量表(言语、空间和听力质量量表)和设备使用满意度量表。≥55 岁的参与者进行蒙特利尔认知评估筛查工具测试。100 名入组者完成了基线评估。
双侧助听平均言语理解分数为 CNC 词 28%,AzBio 句子+10dB SNR 为 31%,+5dB SNR 为 17%。平均量表评分分别为整体生活质量 0.46 和功能性听力能力 3.19。90%的参与者报告对整体听力表现不满意。
评估结果包括量化听力损失对整体幸福感的有害影响的功能表现指标,强调双侧助听器对双侧中度至重度感音神经性听力损失患者不是一种有效的治疗方法。对于这种程度的听力障碍患者,他们的助听言语理解能力较差,日常生活中对听力能力不满意,需要及时转介到人工耳蜗植入诊所进行进一步评估。