Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.043. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of femoral head and neck fenestration combined with compacted autograft (light bulb procedure) through a direct anterior approach for early stage nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating 66 hips undergoing the light bulb procedure through the direct anterior approach (light bulb group) and 59 hips undergoing traditional core decompression (control group). Visual analog scale pain scores and range of hip motion were evaluated before discharge to assess the quality of functional recovery. Follow-up was conducted at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and annually after surgery until 4 years. The clinical effectiveness was evaluated by Harris hip score and the University of California Los Angeles activity-level score. Patients were followed up with postoperative X-ray and computed tomography. Survival was compared between the 2 groups by radiographic progression and receiving total hip arthroplasty.
There was no significant difference in quality of functional recovery between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes within 1 year after surgery. Patients in the light bulb group had significantly better Harris hip scores and University of California Los Angeles activity-level scores from 2 years after surgery to the end of follow-up. During the 4-year follow-up, significantly fewer patients in light bulb group had radiographic progression (22.7% vs 44.1%) or received total hip arthroplasty (15.2% vs 30.5%).
The light bulb procedure through a direct anterior approach offers significantly better results for the treatment of early stage nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head compared with traditional core decompression.
本研究旨在评估经直接前入路行股骨头颈开窗并打压植骨术(灯泡术)治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死的疗效。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,共纳入 66 例行直接前入路灯泡术(灯泡组)和 59 例行传统核心减压术(对照组)的髋关节。通过出院前的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和髋关节活动范围评估功能恢复质量。术后 6 周、3 个月、6 个月和每年进行随访,直至 4 年。采用 Harris 髋关节评分和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分评估临床疗效。术后随访均行 X 线和 CT 检查。通过影像学进展和全髋关节置换术(THA)比较两组的生存率。
两组功能恢复质量无显著差异。术后 1 年内两组临床结果无显著差异。灯泡组在术后 2 年至随访结束时 Harris 髋关节评分和 UCLA 活动评分明显优于对照组。在 4 年随访期间,灯泡组影像学进展(22.7%比 44.1%)和接受 THA(15.2%比 30.5%)的患者明显较少。
与传统核心减压术相比,经直接前入路行股骨头颈开窗并打压植骨术治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死可获得更好的效果。