Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China.
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):412-418. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000231.
Bone grafting is considered a method that can provide mechanical and structural support to the femoral head and prevent the collapse of the femoral head after core decompression (CD). However, there are no consensus guidelines on which bone grafting method is best after CD. The authors assessed the efficacy of various bone grafting modalities and CD through a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).
Ten articles were retrieved from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library searches. Bone graft modalities are categorized into four, and CD is the control group: (1) CD, (2) autologous bone graft (ABG), (3) biomaterial bone graft (BBG), (4) bone graft combined with bone marrow graft (BG+BM), and (5) free vascular bone graft (FVBG). The rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral head necrosis progression rate, and Harris hip score (HHS) improvement were compared among the five treatments.
A total of 816 hips were included in the NMA: specifically, 118 hips in CD, 334 in ABG, 133 in BBG, 113 in BG+BM, and 118 in FVBG. The NMA results show no significant differences in preventing conversion to THA and improving HHS in each group. All bone graft methods are better than CD in preventing osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) progress [ABG: odds ratio (OR)=0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.56; BBG: OR=0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.52; BG+BM: OR=0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.24; FVBG: OR=0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.38]. The rankgrams indicate that BG+BM is the best intervention in preventing conversion to THA (73%), preventing ONFH progress (75%), and improving HHS (57%), followed by the BBG in preventing conversion to THA (54%), improving HHS (38%), and the FVBG in preventing ONFH progress (42%).
This finding indicates that bone grafting after CD is necessary to prevent ONFH progression. Moreover, bone grafts combined with bone marrow grafts and BBG seem to be effective treatment methods in ONFH.
植骨被认为是一种可以为股骨头提供机械和结构支撑的方法,可以防止核心减压(CD)后股骨头塌陷。然而,对于 CD 后哪种植骨方法最好,目前尚无共识指南。作者通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估了各种植骨方式和 CD 的疗效。
从 PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Cochrane Library 检索中检索到 10 篇文章。将植骨方式分为 4 类,CD 为对照组:(1)CD,(2)自体骨移植(ABG),(3)生物材料骨移植(BBG),(4)植骨联合骨髓移植(BG+BM),(5)游离血管骨移植(FVBG)。比较 5 种治疗方法中髋关节置换术(THA)转化率、股骨头坏死进展率和髋关节评分(HHS)改善率。
NMA 共纳入 816 髋:CD 组 118 髋,ABG 组 334 髋,BBG 组 133 髋,BG+BM 组 113 髋,FVBG 组 118 髋。NMA 结果显示,各组在预防 THA 转化率和改善 HHS 方面均无显著差异。所有植骨方法在预防股骨头坏死(ONFH)进展方面均优于 CD [ABG:比值比(OR)=0.21,95%置信区间:0.07-0.56;BBG:OR=0.13,95%CI:0.03-0.52;BG+BM:OR=0.06,95%CI:0.01-0.24;FVBG:OR=0.11,95%CI:0.02-0.38]。等级图表明,BG+BM 在预防 THA 转化率(73%)、预防 ONFH 进展(75%)和改善 HHS(57%)方面是最佳干预措施,其次是 BBG 在预防 THA 转化率(54%)、改善 HHS(38%)和 FVBG 在预防 ONFH 进展(42%)方面。
这一发现表明,CD 后植骨是预防 ONFH 进展的必要手段。此外,骨髓联合植骨和 BBG 似乎是治疗 ONFH 的有效方法。