Morisawa Daisuke, Ohno Yuko, Ohta Yoshihiro, Orihara Yoshiyuki, Masai Kumiko, Goda Akiko, Asakura Masanori, Ishihara Masaharu
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
J Cardiol Cases. 2019 Sep 7;20(6):213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2019.08.016. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Mid-diastolic forward flow velocity of transmitral flow (L wave) is known as a marker of diastolic dysfunction and is occasionally observed in patients with fluid retention, low heart rate, and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, how hemodynamic condition affects L wave is still unknown. An 81-year-old woman who underwent implantation of a DDD pacemaker due to complete atrioventricular block 38 years previously suffered from congestive heart failure and was admitted to our hospital. At the time of admission, electrocardiogram showed new-onset AF resulting in mode switch to VVI, and echocardiography showed a giant L wave. At the mid-term of the treatment, AF was converted to sinus rhythm resulting in mode switch to DDD, and pacemaker check-up was performed at pre- and post-cardioversion. During the pacemaker check-ups, L wave was assessed in various pacing rates. As pacing rate was increased, L wave altered according to heart rates and disappeared at 85 bpm in VVI with AF, whereas at 75 bpm in DDD. Through the treatment, L wave got smaller as fluid retention was improved and finally disappeared at the time of discharge. This case suggests that L wave is highly variable and affected by fluid volume, heart rate, and heart rhythm. < Although L wave is known as a marker of diastolic dysfunction and occasionally observed in patients with high left ventricular filling pressure, low heart rate, and atrial fibrillation, how hemodynamics affects L wave is still unknown. In this case, it was observed that L wave is highly variable in the therapeutic process of heart failure and affected by fluid volume, heart rate, and heart rhythm. L wave potentially can be a useful indicator to evaluate treatment efficacy for heart failure.>.
二尖瓣血流舒张中期前向血流速度(L波)是舒张功能障碍的一个指标,在液体潴留、心率缓慢和心房颤动(AF)患者中偶尔可见。然而,血流动力学状况如何影响L波仍不清楚。一名81岁女性,38年前因完全性房室传导阻滞植入DDD起搏器,患有充血性心力衰竭,入住我院。入院时,心电图显示新发房颤,导致模式转换为VVI,超声心动图显示巨大L波。在治疗中期,房颤转为窦性心律,导致模式转换为DDD,并在复律前后进行起搏器检查。在起搏器检查期间,在不同起搏频率下评估L波。随着起搏频率增加,L波根据心率发生变化,在房颤时VVI模式下85次/分时消失,而在DDD模式下75次/分时消失。通过治疗,随着液体潴留改善,L波变小,最终在出院时消失。该病例表明,L波变化很大,受液体量、心率和心律影响。<尽管L波是舒张功能障碍的一个指标,在左心室充盈压高、心率缓慢和心房颤动患者中偶尔可见,但血流动力学如何影响L波仍不清楚。在该病例中,观察到L波在心力衰竭治疗过程中变化很大,受液体量、心率和心律影响。L波可能是评估心力衰竭治疗效果的一个有用指标。>