Pfaltz Monique C, Passardi Sandra, Auschra Bianca, Fares-Otero Natalia E, Schnyder Ulrich, Peyk Peter
Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):1682929. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1682929. eCollection 2019.
: Individuals with a high prevalence of child maltreatment, e.g. those with borderline personality disorder, tend to see neutral facial expressions as negative. : Our aim was to assess whether this bias is present in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and whether it is linked to child maltreatment. : Thirty-nine PTSD participants, 44 traumatized and 35 non-traumatized healthy controls watched 300 one-second movies showing 30 neutral and 270 emotional facial expressions, and indicated whether they interpreted each as a neutral or as one of nine emotional expressions. : PTSD individuals did not perform differently than the two control groups in the recognition and interpretation of neutral facial expressions ('s < .300). Higher levels of childhood sexual and emotional abuse, and physical neglect were linked to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as contempt ( < .043), and (for sexual abuse and physical neglect) to more interpretations of neutral facial expressions as anger (p's < .014). Comparisons of statistical model fits suggested that childhood sexual abuse was the most relevant predictor of recognition accuracy in our sample. Alexithymia, state dissociation, interpersonal trauma, and number of experienced trauma types were not associated with deficits in the interpretation of neutral expressions. : Child maltreatment, especially sexual abuse, may shape the interpretation of neutral facial expressions. Future research should explore whether the observed biases extend to real-life situations. If so, therapists might improve the therapeutic relationship with patients with a history of child maltreatment by paying more attention to their own non-verbal communication and their patients' responses to it. Furthermore, similarly to individuals with high depressive and high social anxiety symptoms, facial expression recognition training might counteract negativity bias in individuals with a history of childhood (sexual and emotional) abuse, and (physical) neglect.
遭受儿童虐待比例较高的个体,例如患有边缘型人格障碍的人,往往会将中性面部表情视为负面表情。我们的目的是评估这种偏差是否存在于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者中,以及它是否与儿童虐待有关。39名PTSD参与者、44名受过创伤的人和35名未受过创伤的健康对照者观看了300部时长为一秒的影片,这些影片展示了30种中性面部表情和270种情绪面部表情,并要求他们指出自己将每种表情理解为中性表情还是九种情绪表情之一。PTSD患者在识别和解读中性面部表情方面的表现与两个对照组没有差异(p <.300)。童年时期更高程度的性虐待、情感虐待以及身体忽视与将更多中性面部表情解读为轻蔑有关(p <.043),并且(对于性虐待和身体忽视而言)与将更多中性面部表情解读为愤怒有关(p值 <.014)。统计模型拟合的比较表明,童年性虐待是我们样本中识别准确性的最相关预测因素。述情障碍、状态解离、人际创伤以及经历的创伤类型数量与中性表情解读缺陷无关。儿童虐待,尤其是性虐待,可能会影响对中性面部表情的解读。未来的研究应该探讨观察到的这种偏差是否会延伸到现实生活情境中。如果是这样,治疗师可能通过更加关注自己的非言语交流以及患者对此的反应,来改善与有儿童虐待史患者的治疗关系。此外,与患有高度抑郁和高度社交焦虑症状的个体类似,面部表情识别训练可能会抵消有童年(性和情感)虐待史以及(身体)忽视史个体的消极偏差。