Iffland Benjamin, Neuner Frank
Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 16;11:732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00732. eCollection 2020.
Distorted cognitive processing has been found among survivors of child maltreatment. However, different types of abuse and neglect may bring about differences in emotion and attention processing. The present study aimed to detect differential associations between various types of childhood maltreatment and attentional biases in facial emotion processing.
A non-clinical sample was recruited on University campus and consisted of 67 individuals with varying degrees of maltreatment. In an evaluative conditioning task, images of faces with neutral emotional expressions were either associated with short videos of intense negative statements, or associated with neutral videos. Subsequently, these faces were used as stimuli in a face in the crowd recognition task in which the familiar faces had to be recognized within a crowd of unfamiliar neutral faces.
In multiple linear regression analyses controlling for the intercorrelatedness of types of maltreatment, differential relationships between types of maltreatment and attentional bias were found. While emotional abuse was associated with faster detection of negatively associated faces, emotional neglect was associated with an impaired recognition of familiar stimuli regardless of the emotional content.
Results indicated that interindividual differences in cognitive biases may be due to the activation of diverse cognitive schemas based on differential experiences of maltreatment.
在遭受过儿童期虐待的幸存者中发现了认知加工扭曲的情况。然而,不同类型的虐待和忽视可能会在情绪和注意力加工方面带来差异。本研究旨在检测童年期不同类型的虐待与面部情绪加工中的注意偏向之间的差异关联。
在大学校园招募了一个非临床样本,由67名遭受不同程度虐待的个体组成。在一个评价性条件反射任务中,中性情绪表情的面部图像要么与强烈负面陈述的短视频相关联,要么与中性视频相关联。随后,这些面孔被用作“人群中的面孔”识别任务的刺激物,在该任务中,必须在一群不熟悉的中性面孔中识别出熟悉的面孔。
在控制了虐待类型之间相互关联性的多元线性回归分析中,发现了虐待类型与注意偏向之间的差异关系。虽然情感虐待与更快检测出负性关联面孔有关,但情感忽视与无论情绪内容如何对熟悉刺激的识别受损有关。
结果表明,认知偏差的个体差异可能是由于基于不同虐待经历激活了不同的认知图式。