• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用DISCERN工具评估在线患者良性血管肿瘤教育资源的可读性、充分性和适用性。

Assessment of the Readability, Adequacy, and Suitability of Online Patient Education Resources for Benign Vascular Tumours Using the DISCERN Instrument.

作者信息

Huynh Minh N Q, Hicks Katie E, Malic Claudia

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 Nov;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1177/2292550319880911. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1177/2292550319880911
PMID:31763333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6851725/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the quality and readability of Internet-based patient resources for vascular tumours in order to understand which areas require improvement.

METHODS

A World Wide Web search was performed, in addition to a literature review using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Any material that contained information on vascular tumours pertaining to patient education was included. We evaluated resources with DISCERN and Flesch Reading Ease scores when applicable. The language of publication was restricted to English and French. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087885).

RESULTS

A total of 117 online resources were screened, with 73 resources included in the final analysis. The overall DISCERN rating for the patient resources was 1.8 (0.8). The majority of online resources failed to depict the entire spectrum of benign vascular tumours. The mean Flesch score was 36 (19), which translates to a college-level readability.

CONCLUSION

The majority of resources were not adequate or comprehensive and were written at a much higher level than the average reader would be expected to comprehend.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估基于互联网的血管肿瘤患者资源的质量和可读性,以了解哪些方面需要改进。

方法

除了使用PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和EMBASE进行文献综述外,还进行了万维网搜索。纳入任何包含与患者教育相关的血管肿瘤信息的材料。适用时,我们用DISCERN和弗莱什易读性分数评估资源。出版物语言限于英语和法语。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42018087885)注册。

结果

共筛选了117个在线资源,最终分析纳入73个资源。患者资源的总体DISCERN评分为1.8(0.8)。大多数在线资源未能描述良性血管肿瘤的全貌。平均弗莱什分数为36(19),相当于大学水平的可读性。

结论

大多数资源不充分或不全面,其撰写水平远远高于普通读者的理解能力。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Readability, Adequacy, and Suitability of Online Patient Education Resources for Benign Vascular Tumours Using the DISCERN Instrument.使用DISCERN工具评估在线患者良性血管肿瘤教育资源的可读性、充分性和适用性。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 Nov;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1177/2292550319880911. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
2
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.针对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者设计的在线患者教育材料评估。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x.
4
Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment.关于糖尿病足溃疡的基于互联网的患者教育材料:可读性和质量评估。
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Jan 11;7(1):e27221. doi: 10.2196/27221.
5
Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.眼科患者教育材料的可读性:一项单机构研究及系统评价
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
6
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料的可读性、适宜性和健康内容评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.耳鸣的英文互联网信息的质量与可读性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):31-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17070. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.在线饮食失调信息的可读性和质量——它们是否足够?使用 DISCERN 和 Flesch 可读性评估神经性厌食症网站的系统评价。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jan;53(1):128-132. doi: 10.1002/eat.23173. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
9
What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.家长们正在阅读的关于喉软化症的内容:喉软化症网络资源的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;108:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
10
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of non-emergency surgical patients toward anesthesia.非急诊手术患者对麻醉的知识、态度及实践
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 1;14(1):17763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68808-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Vascular Anomalies (Part I): Classification and Diagnostics of Vascular Anomalies.血管异常(第一部分):血管异常的分类与诊断
Rofo. 2018 Sep;190(9):825-835. doi: 10.1055/a-0620-8925. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
2
Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Health Literacy and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: A Prospective Community Study.健康素养与心力衰竭患者结局:一项前瞻性社区研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Jan;93(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Health Literacy: An Important Clinical Tool in Heart Failure.健康素养:心力衰竭治疗中的一项重要临床工具
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Jan;93(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
Facial Plastic Surgery Patient Resources Exceed National Institute Recommendations.面部整形手术患者资源超出了美国国立卫生研究院的建议。
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):759-763. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003435.
6
What might parents read: Sorting webs of online information on vascular anomalies.家长们可能会阅读什么:梳理有关血管异常的在线信息网络。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;93:63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
7
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
8
Patient Education Materials in Dermatology: Addressing the Health Literacy Needs of Patients.皮肤科患者教育材料:满足患者的健康素养需求
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):946-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.1135.
9
Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.检查常见内科诊断的互联网医学信息的阅读水平。
Am J Med. 2016 Jun;129(6):637-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
10
Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.评估乳腺癌互联网信息的质量。
Breast. 2016 Feb;25:34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.