Suppr超能文献

使用DISCERN工具评估在线患者良性血管肿瘤教育资源的可读性、充分性和适用性。

Assessment of the Readability, Adequacy, and Suitability of Online Patient Education Resources for Benign Vascular Tumours Using the DISCERN Instrument.

作者信息

Huynh Minh N Q, Hicks Katie E, Malic Claudia

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 Nov;27(4):325-333. doi: 10.1177/2292550319880911. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the quality and readability of Internet-based patient resources for vascular tumours in order to understand which areas require improvement.

METHODS

A World Wide Web search was performed, in addition to a literature review using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Any material that contained information on vascular tumours pertaining to patient education was included. We evaluated resources with DISCERN and Flesch Reading Ease scores when applicable. The language of publication was restricted to English and French. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087885).

RESULTS

A total of 117 online resources were screened, with 73 resources included in the final analysis. The overall DISCERN rating for the patient resources was 1.8 (0.8). The majority of online resources failed to depict the entire spectrum of benign vascular tumours. The mean Flesch score was 36 (19), which translates to a college-level readability.

CONCLUSION

The majority of resources were not adequate or comprehensive and were written at a much higher level than the average reader would be expected to comprehend.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估基于互联网的血管肿瘤患者资源的质量和可读性,以了解哪些方面需要改进。

方法

除了使用PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和EMBASE进行文献综述外,还进行了万维网搜索。纳入任何包含与患者教育相关的血管肿瘤信息的材料。适用时,我们用DISCERN和弗莱什易读性分数评估资源。出版物语言限于英语和法语。本综述已在PROSPERO(CRD42018087885)注册。

结果

共筛选了117个在线资源,最终分析纳入73个资源。患者资源的总体DISCERN评分为1.8(0.8)。大多数在线资源未能描述良性血管肿瘤的全貌。平均弗莱什分数为36(19),相当于大学水平的可读性。

结论

大多数资源不充分或不全面,其撰写水平远远高于普通读者的理解能力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jan;104:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
Health Literacy: An Important Clinical Tool in Heart Failure.健康素养:心力衰竭治疗中的一项重要临床工具
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Jan;93(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.肺癌相关在线资源的可读性分析
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
10
Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer.评估乳腺癌互联网信息的质量。
Breast. 2016 Feb;25:34-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验