Hutchinson Nora, Baird Grayson L, Garg Megha
Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.
Am J Med. 2016 Jun;129(6):637-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that health materials be written at a grade 6-7 reading level, which has generally not been achieved in online reading materials. Up to the present time, there have not been any assessments focused on the reading level of online educational materials across the most popular consumer Web sites for common internal medicine diagnoses. In this study, we examined the readability of open-access online health information for 9 common internal medicine diagnoses.
Nine of the most frequently encountered inpatient and ambulatory internal medicine diagnoses were selected for analysis. In November and December 2014, these diagnoses were used as search terms in Google, and the top 5 Web sites across all diagnoses and a diagnosis-specific site were analyzed across 5 validated reading indices.
On average, the lowest reading grade-level content was provided by the NIH (10.7), followed by WebMD (10.9), Mayo Clinic (11.3), and diagnosis-specific Web sites (11.5). Conversely, Wikipedia provided content that required the highest grade-level readability (14.6). The diagnoses with the lowest reading grade levels were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.8), followed by diabetes (10.9), congestive heart failure (11.7), osteoporosis (11.7) and hypertension (11.7). Depression had the highest grade-level readability (13.8).
Despite recommendations for patient health information to be written at a grade 6-7 reading level, our examination of online educational materials pertaining to 9 common internal medicine diagnoses revealed reading levels significantly above the NIH recommendation. This was seen across both diagnosis-specific and general Web sites. There is a need to improve the readability of online educational materials made available to patients. These improvements have the potential to greatly enhance patient awareness, engagement, and physician-patient communication.
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)建议健康材料的编写应达到6-7年级的阅读水平,但在线阅读材料普遍未达到这一标准。截至目前,尚未有针对最受欢迎的常见内科诊断消费类网站上在线教育材料阅读水平的评估。在本研究中,我们检查了9种常见内科诊断的开放获取在线健康信息的可读性。
选择9种最常见的住院和门诊内科诊断进行分析。2014年11月和12月,将这些诊断用作谷歌的搜索词,并对所有诊断的前5个网站和一个特定诊断网站进行了5种经过验证的阅读指数分析。
平均而言,NIH提供的阅读等级水平内容最低(10.7),其次是WebMD(10.9)、梅奥诊所(11.3)和特定诊断网站(11.5)。相反,维基百科提供的内容需要最高的阅读等级水平(14.6)。阅读等级水平最低的诊断是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(10.8),其次是糖尿病(10.9)、充血性心力衰竭(11.7)、骨质疏松症(11.7)和高血压(11.7)。抑郁症的阅读等级水平最高(13.8)。
尽管建议患者健康信息的编写应达到6-7年级的阅读水平,但我们对9种常见内科诊断的在线教育材料的检查发现,阅读水平明显高于NIH的建议。在特定诊断网站和一般网站上均是如此。有必要提高提供给患者的在线教育材料的可读性。这些改进有可能极大地提高患者的意识、参与度以及医患沟通。