Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Cornea. 2020 May;39(5):578-583. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002218.
The present study aimed to compare the prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) among visual display terminal users using the revised and previous DED criteria.
This cross-sectional study included 561 participants (187 women).
The distribution of diagnostic status according to the previous DED criteria was as follows: definite DED (n = 65, 11.6%), probable DED (n = 303, 54.0%), and non-DED (n = 193, 34.4%). According to the revised criteria, 329 participants (58.6%) were classified as DED and 232 participants (41.4%) were classified as non-DED.
The prevalence of DED among visual display terminal users has increased to 58.6% from 11.6%, according to the revised DED diagnostic criteria of the Asia Dry Eye Society.
本研究旨在比较使用修订后的和之前的干眼疾病(DED)标准的视觉显示终端用户中 DED 的患病率。
这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 561 名参与者(187 名女性)。
根据之前的 DED 标准,诊断状态的分布如下:明确的 DED(n = 65,11.6%)、可能的 DED(n = 303,54.0%)和非 DED(n = 193,34.4%)。根据修订后的标准,329 名参与者(58.6%)被归类为 DED,232 名参与者(41.4%)被归类为非 DED。
根据亚洲干眼协会修订后的 DED 诊断标准,视觉显示终端用户中 DED 的患病率从 11.6%上升至 58.6%。