Suppr超能文献

构建和验证长期居住在养老院居民的急诊就诊风险调整率。

Construction and Validation of Risk-adjusted Rates of Emergency Department Visits for Long-stay Nursing Home Residents.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.

Department of Economics, Farmer School of Business.

出版信息

Med Care. 2020 Feb;58(2):174-182. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001246.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-stay nursing home (NH) residents are at high risk of having emergency department (ED) visits, but current knowledge regarding risk-adjusted ED rates is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To construct and validate 3 quarterly risk-adjusted rates of long-stay residents' ED use: any ED visit, ED visits without hospitalization or observation stay (outpatient ED), and potentially avoidable ED visits (PAED).

RESEARCH DESIGN

The authors calculated quarterly NH risk-adjusted ED rates from 2011 Q2 to 2013 Q3 national Medicare claims and Minimum Data Set data. Using random-effect linear regressions, the authors validated these rates against Nursing Home Compare overall 5-star quality ratings and examined their associations with hospitalization rates to provide a quality context.

SUBJECTS

Resident-quarter observations (7.3 million) from 15,235 unique NHs.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted rates of any ED, outpatient ED, and PAED averaged 9.7%, 3.4%, and 3.2%, respectively. Compared with NHs with 1 or 2 stars overall rating, NHs with ≥3 stars were significantly associated with lower rates of any ED visit, outpatient ED, and PAED (β, -0.23%, -0.16%, and -0.11%, respectively; all P<0.01). Pearson Correlation coefficients between hospitalization rates and rates of any ED visit, outpatient ED, and PAED were 0.74, 0.31, and 0.46, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The moderately negative associations of 5-star ratings with ED rates provide supportive evidence to their validity. Outpatient ED and PAED were moderately correlated to hospitalizations suggesting they provided more information about quality than any ED.

摘要

背景

长期居住在养老院的居民有较高的风险需要去急诊部(ED)就诊,但目前关于风险调整后 ED 使用率的知识有限。

目的

构建和验证长期居住居民急诊使用的 3 个季度风险调整率:任何 ED 就诊、无住院或观察留观(门诊 ED)的 ED 就诊以及潜在可避免的 ED 就诊(PAED)。

研究设计

作者从 2011 年第二季度到 2013 年第三季度的全国医疗保险索赔和最低数据集中计算了每个季度的 NH 风险调整 ED 率。作者使用随机效应线性回归,根据养老院比较的整体 5 星级质量评分验证了这些比率,并检查了它们与住院率的关联,以提供质量背景。

研究对象

来自 15235 个独特养老院的居民季度观察数据(730 万)。

结果

任何 ED、门诊 ED 和 PAED 的风险调整率分别平均为 9.7%、3.4%和 3.2%。与整体评级为 1 或 2 星的 NH 相比,评级≥3 星的 NH 与任何 ED 就诊、门诊 ED 和 PAED 的发生率显著降低相关(β,-0.23%、-0.16%和-0.11%;均 P<0.01)。住院率与任何 ED 就诊、门诊 ED 和 PAED 发生率之间的 Pearson 相关系数分别为 0.74、0.31 和 0.46。

结论

5 星级评级与 ED 率之间的适度负相关为其有效性提供了支持性证据。门诊 ED 和 PAED 与住院率中度相关,表明它们比任何 ED 就诊提供了更多的质量信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验