Departments of Surgery, Cancer Control.
Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Med Care. 2021 Jan;59(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001451.
Higher risk-adjusted rate of emergency department (ED) visits might reflect poor quality of nursing home (NH) care; however, existing evidence is limited regarding rural-urban differences in ED rates of NHs, especially for long-stay residents.
To determine and quantify sources of rural-urban differences in NH risk-adjusted rates of any ED visit, ED without hospitalization or observation stay (outpatient ED), and potentially avoidable ED visits (PAED) of long-stay residents.
We calculated quarterly NH risk-adjusted rates using 2011-2013 national Medicare claims and Minimum Data Set 3.0, and then implemented Generalized Estimating Equation models to examine rural-urban differences in ED rates and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition to quantify the contributions of NH and market factors.
Privately owned, free-standing NHs in the United States (N=13,260).
Over the study period, risk-adjusted rates averaged 9.8% for any ED, 3.3% for outpatient ED, and 3.2% for PAED. Compared with urban NHs, rural NHs were associated with significantly lower rates of any ED, outpatient ED, and PAED (β=-1.67%, -0.44%, and -0.28%; all P<0.01). Observable differences in market factors (nursing home bed concentration, hospital beds, and the existence of a critical access hospital) explained about half of the rural-urban differences in rates of any ED and PAED, but not outpatient ED.
Decomposition analyses suggested that lower ED rates in rural NHs appear to be related to market availability of hospital resources. Policymakers may focus on not only reducing unnecessary ED visits but also ensuring equitable hospital access in rural areas.
急诊部(ED)就诊风险调整率较高可能反映了养老院(NH)护理质量较差;然而,现有证据对于 NH 的 ED 率在城乡之间的差异有限,尤其是对于长期居住者。
确定并量化城乡之间 NH 风险调整后任何 ED 就诊、无住院或观察期(门诊 ED)就诊以及长期居住者可避免 ED 就诊(PAED)率的差异来源。
我们使用 2011-2013 年全国医疗保险索赔和最小数据集 3.0 计算了 NH 风险调整后的季度率,然后实施了广义估计方程模型来检验 ED 率的城乡差异,并进行 Blinder-Oaxaca 分解来量化 NH 和市场因素的贡献。
美国私人拥有、独立的 NH(N=13260)。
在研究期间,任何 ED 的风险调整后率平均为 9.8%,门诊 ED 为 3.3%,PAED 为 3.2%。与城市 NH 相比,农村 NH 与任何 ED、门诊 ED 和 PAED 的就诊率显著较低(β=-1.67%、-0.44%和-0.28%;均 P<0.01)。市场因素(NH 床位集中、医院床位和存在关键接入医院)的可观察差异解释了 ED 率和 PAED 率城乡差异的一半左右,但不能解释门诊 ED 率的差异。
分解分析表明,农村 NH 的 ED 率较低似乎与医院资源的市场可用性有关。政策制定者可能不仅要关注减少不必要的 ED 就诊,还要确保农村地区获得公平的医院资源。