University of Bologna.
University of Parma.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Apr;32(4):621-633. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01505. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Emotional stimuli engage corticolimbic circuits and capture attention even when they are task-irrelevant distractors. Whether top-down or contextual factors can modulate the filtering of emotional distractors is a matter of debate. Recent studies have indicated that behavioral interference by emotional distractors habituates rapidly when the same stimuli are repeated across trials. However, little is known as to whether we can attenuate the impact of novel (never repeated) emotional distractors when they occur frequently. In two experiments, we investigated the effects of distractor frequency on the processing of task-irrelevant novel pictures, as reflected in both behavioral interference and neural activity, while participants were engaged in an orientation discrimination task. Experiment 1 showed that, compared with a rare distractor condition (20%), frequent distractors (80%) reduced the interference of emotional stimuli. Moreover, Experiment 2 provided evidence that emotional interference was reduced by distractor frequency even when rare, and unexpected, emotional distractors appeared among frequent neutral distractors. On the other hand, in both experiments, the late positive potential amplitude was enhanced for emotional, compared with neutral, pictures, and this emotional modulation was not reduced when distractors were frequently presented. Altogether, these findings suggest that the high occurrence of task-irrelevant stimuli does not proactively prevent the processing of emotional distractors. Even when attention allocation to novel emotional stimuli is reduced, evaluative processes and the engagement of motivational systems are needed to support the monitoring of the environment for significant events.
情绪刺激会激活皮质边缘回路,并吸引注意力,即使它们是与任务无关的干扰。无论是自上而下的因素还是上下文因素,都可以调节情绪干扰的过滤,这是一个有争议的问题。最近的研究表明,当相同的刺激在试验中重复出现时,情绪干扰的行为干扰会迅速习惯化。然而,当新的(从未重复过的)情绪干扰者经常出现时,我们是否能够减轻它们的影响,目前还知之甚少。在两项实验中,我们研究了干扰物频率对无关任务的新图片处理的影响,这反映在行为干扰和神经活动中,而参与者则参与了定向辨别任务。实验 1 表明,与罕见的干扰条件(20%)相比,频繁的干扰(80%)减少了情绪刺激的干扰。此外,实验 2 提供了证据表明,即使是罕见的、意外的情绪干扰者出现在频繁的中性干扰者中,干扰频率也会降低情绪干扰。另一方面,在两项实验中,与中性图片相比,情绪图片的晚期正电位幅度增强,而当频繁呈现干扰时,这种情绪调节并未减弱。总的来说,这些发现表明,无关任务的刺激的高出现率并不能主动阻止情绪干扰的处理。即使对新的情绪刺激的注意力分配减少,评估过程和动机系统的参与也需要支持对环境中重要事件的监测。