Department of Extension, University of Connecticut, Tolland County Extension Center, 24 Hyde Ave, Vernon, CT 06066, USA.
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Puyallup, WA 98371, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 10;703:135577. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135577. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
Plastic biodegradable mulch (plastic BDM) is tilled after use, but there is concern about incomplete degradation and potential impact on subsequent crops, and we lack a reliable method to measure mulch degradation post soil-incorporation. We conducted two field experiments to (i) develop a sampling method to estimate the amount of mulch (fragments size >2.36 mm) in the field post soil-incorporation, and (ii) assess the amount of BDM in the soil after four consecutive years of mulch incorporation. In Expt. 1, we used the quartering method to reduce soil from a 1 m field sample area to a representative 19 L sample. In Expt. 2, we applied and tilled four plastic BDMs: BioAgri, Naturecycle, Organix AG, and an experimental mulch; and one paper mulch, WeedGuardPlus, in their respective plots for four consecutive years. Starting in year 2, we sampled soil with the quartering method each spring and fall to determine mulch recovery. With respect to the total amount of mulch applied, average mulch recovery in the fall for the three commercial plastic BDMs was 71%, 50%, and 35% after second, third and fourth applications, respectively. For the experimental mulch, the average recovery was 80%, 69%, and 54% in the fall after second, third, and fourth applications, respectively. Recovery was slightly lower in spring than in preceding fall all years. For WeedGuardPlus, average recovery was 14%-20% in each fall, and no recovery in any spring (complete degradation). The results show that the quartering method reliably estimates the amount of mulch in a field and BDMs degrade over time in the field even with repeated applications, but complete degradation takes >1 year. While a few standards (e.g., ASTM D5988) specify how to determine biodegradation of plastics in soil under controlled laboratory conditions, our sampling method assesses plastic degradation under diverse field conditions.
可生物降解塑料地膜(塑料 BDM)在使用后进行翻耕,但人们担心其不能完全降解,以及对后续作物可能产生的影响,而我们缺乏一种可靠的方法来测量土壤掩埋后地膜的降解情况。我们进行了两项田间试验,(i)开发了一种采样方法来估计土壤掩埋后田间残留地膜(碎片尺寸>2.36 毫米)的数量,以及(ii)评估连续四年使用地膜后土壤中的 BDM 含量。在试验 1 中,我们使用四分法将 1 米田间样本区域的土壤减少到具有代表性的 19 升样本。在试验 2 中,我们连续四年在各自的地块上施用并翻耕了四种塑料 BDM:BioAgri、Naturecycle、Organix AG 和一种实验性地膜;以及一种纸质地膜 WeedGuardPlus。从第二年开始,我们每年春季和秋季都采用四分法采样来确定地膜的回收率。就施用的地膜总量而言,在第二年、第三年和第四年的秋季,三种商业塑料 BDM 的平均地膜回收率分别为 71%、50%和 35%。对于实验性地膜,第二年、第三年和第四年的秋季平均回收率分别为 80%、69%和 54%。所有年份秋季的回收率均略低于前一年秋季。对于 WeedGuardPlus,每年秋季的平均回收率为 14%-20%,而在任何春季都没有回收率(完全降解)。结果表明,四分法能够可靠地估计田间地膜的数量,并且 BDM 会随着时间的推移在田间降解,即使重复应用也是如此,但完全降解需要>1 年。虽然一些标准(例如 ASTM D5988)规定了如何在控制的实验室条件下确定塑料在土壤中的生物降解情况,但我们的采样方法评估了不同田间条件下塑料的降解情况。