Zeng Yanbing, Luo Mingliang, Lin Jianlin, He Hanqing, Deng Xuan, Xie Shuyun, Fang Ya
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment of Fujian Province, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Apr 2;16(4):955-964. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1688031. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the current strategy combining universal vaccination with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) treatment for infants of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive mothers compared with universal vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine only.: A decision tree model with a Markov process was constructed and used to simulate the lifetime of the birth cohort in Zhejiang Province during 2016. The current strategy was compared against universal vaccination with respect to costs and health effects. Costs were assessed from the health care system perspective. Health effects were measured by the number of hepatitis B virus (HBV) related diseases and deaths avoided and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost‑effectiveness ratio (ICER) is calculated and compared to standard willingness-to-pay thresholds. A one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to assess parameter uncertainties.: Over the cohort's lifetime, 182 acute symptomatic infections, 2215 chronic infections, 872 cases of cirrhosis, 595 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1,350 HBV-related deaths among the cohort of 624,000 infants would be further avoided by the current strategy compared to universal vaccination. Universal vaccination was dominated by the current strategy that produced not only higher total QALYs, but also had lower costs. The results remained robust over a wide range of assumptions.: The current strategy was cost saving compared to universal vaccination, and continuing the current strategy is recommended to further decrease the burden of hepatitis B.
为评估当前将普遍接种疫苗与乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG)治疗相结合用于乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阳性母亲所生婴儿的策略与仅普遍接种乙型肝炎疫苗相比的成本效益。
构建了一个带有马尔可夫过程的决策树模型,并用于模拟2016年浙江省出生队列的一生。将当前策略与普遍接种疫苗在成本和健康效果方面进行比较。从医疗保健系统的角度评估成本。通过避免的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关疾病和死亡数量以及获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)来衡量健康效果。计算增量成本效益比(ICER),并与标准支付意愿阈值进行比较。进行了单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析(PSA)以评估参数的不确定性。
在该队列的一生中,与普遍接种疫苗相比,当前策略将在624,000名婴儿队列中进一步避免182例急性症状性感染、2215例慢性感染、872例肝硬化、595例肝细胞癌(HCC)和1350例HBV相关死亡。普遍接种疫苗被当前策略所主导,当前策略不仅产生更高的总QALY,而且成本更低。在广泛的假设范围内,结果仍然稳健。
与普遍接种疫苗相比,当前策略具有成本节约效果,建议继续采用当前策略以进一步减轻乙型肝炎负担。