• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意识更强,保护更多:一项关于道路安全技能预测西班牙青少年被动安全元件使用情况的横断面研究。

More aware, more protected: a cross-sectional study on road safety skills predicting the use of passive safety elements among Spanish teenagers.

作者信息

Useche Sergio, Alonso Francisco, Montoro Luis, Garrigós Leandro

机构信息

DATS (Development and Advising in Traffic Safety) Research Group - INTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Valencian Community, Spain

DATS (Development and Advising in Traffic Safety) Research Group - INTRAS (Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety), Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Valencian Community, Spain.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e035007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035007.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035007
PMID:31772115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6887036/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study had two objectives: first, to test the effects of sociodemographic variables, and the effects of three key road safety skills (knowledge-risk perception-attitudes) on the use of passive safety elements (PSEs) among teenagers; and second, to assess the differential impact of the study variables on PSEs use from a gender-based perspective.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study was framed in the paradigm of primary care, and it involved students from several educational centres in Spain. A sample of 827 Spanish teenagers (52.4% females and 47.6% males) with a mean age of M=14.41-7 (12-19) years was used.

RESULTS

Through SEM modelling, we found that the use of PSEs is largely explained by psychosocial variables through the mediation of three road safety skills: risk perception (β=0.103), rule knowledge (β=0.095) and attitudes towards road safety (β=0.186). Furthermore, multigroup analyses showed that, although most variables explain the use of PSEs among teenagers in a similar way, key gender-based differences exist in this regard.

CONCLUSIONS

Road safety skills have a significant effect on the use of PSEs among Spanish teenagers, and gender explains some differences in the mechanisms which predict them. Also, in the study we discuss the need for strengthening school-based interventions aimed at helping this vulnerable group of road users acquire and develop positive behavioural competences.

摘要

目的

本研究有两个目的:第一,测试社会人口统计学变量以及三种关键道路安全技能(知识 - 风险感知 - 态度)对青少年使用被动安全元件(PSE)的影响;第二,从基于性别的角度评估研究变量对PSE使用的差异影响。

设置与参与者

本横断面研究以初级保健模式为框架,涉及西班牙多个教育中心的学生。使用了827名西班牙青少年样本(女性占52.4%,男性占47.6%),平均年龄M = 14.41 - 7(12 - 19)岁。

结果

通过结构方程模型(SEM)建模,我们发现PSE的使用很大程度上由社会心理变量通过三种道路安全技能的中介作用来解释:风险感知(β = 0.103)、规则知识(β = 0.095)和对道路安全的态度(β = 0.186)。此外,多组分析表明,尽管大多数变量以类似方式解释青少年对PSE的使用,但在这方面存在基于性别的关键差异。

结论

道路安全技能对西班牙青少年使用PSE有显著影响,性别解释了预测这些技能的机制中的一些差异。此外,在本研究中我们讨论了加强以学校为基础的干预措施的必要性,旨在帮助这一易受伤害的道路使用者群体获得并发展积极的行为能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/d60ee97cc4de/bmjopen-2019-035007f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/41629a1f9f3d/bmjopen-2019-035007f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/568209928590/bmjopen-2019-035007f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/d60ee97cc4de/bmjopen-2019-035007f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/41629a1f9f3d/bmjopen-2019-035007f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/568209928590/bmjopen-2019-035007f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ece9/6887036/d60ee97cc4de/bmjopen-2019-035007f03.jpg

相似文献

1
More aware, more protected: a cross-sectional study on road safety skills predicting the use of passive safety elements among Spanish teenagers.意识更强,保护更多:一项关于道路安全技能预测西班牙青少年被动安全元件使用情况的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e035007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035007.
2
Behavioral Health at School: Do Three Competences in Road Safety Education Impact the Protective Road Behaviors of Spanish Children?学校中的行为健康:道路安全教育中的三项能力是否会影响西班牙儿童的保护道路行为?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;17(3):935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030935.
3
Effect of Road Safety Education on Road Risky Behaviors of Spanish Children and Adolescents: Findings from a National Study.道路安全教育对西班牙儿童和青少年道路危险行为的影响:一项全国性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 12;15(12):2828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122828.
4
Effectiveness of a school-based road safety educational program for lower secondary school students in Denmark: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.丹麦基于学校的道路安全教育计划对初中生的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Nov;147:105773. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105773. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
An educational intervention in road safety among children and teenagers in Mexico.墨西哥针对儿童和青少年开展的道路安全教育干预措施。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):164-170. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1224344. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
Are Your Eyes "on the Road"? Findings from the 2019 National Study on Vision and Driving Safety in Spain.你的眼睛是否“在路上”?2019 年西班牙全国视觉与驾驶安全研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 4;17(9):3195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093195.
7
Awareness and practice of road safety measures among undergraduate medical students in a South Indian state.印度南部某邦本科医学生对道路安全措施的认知与实践
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 May;20(4):226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.09.022. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Evaluating the impact of an injury prevention measure regarding different sociodemographic factors.评估一项伤害预防措施对不同社会人口学因素的影响。
J Inj Violence Res. 2018 Jan;10(1):25-33. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v10i1.952. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Driving behaviours, traffic risk and road safety: comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore.驾驶行为、交通风险与道路安全:马来西亚与新加坡的比较研究
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2015;22(4):359-67. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2014.925938. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?道路交通事故与葡萄牙汽车驾驶员自我报告的态度、行为和观点:它们之间有关联吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):705-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Is safety in the eye of the beholder? Discrepancies between self-reported and proxied data on road safety behaviors-A systematic review.安全是否因人而异?道路安全行为的自我报告数据与代理数据之间的差异——一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:964387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964387. eCollection 2022.
2
Could Road Safety Education (RSE) Help Parents Protect Children? Examining Their Driving Crashes with Children on Board.道路安全教育(RSE)能否帮助家长保护儿童?研究有儿童在车上时父母驾车碰撞事故。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073611.
3
Behavioral Health at School: Do Three Competences in Road Safety Education Impact the Protective Road Behaviors of Spanish Children?

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting Children's Healthy Habits Through Self-Regulation Via Parenting.通过育儿促进儿童的自我调节健康习惯。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;22(1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00280-6.
2
Effect of Road Safety Education on Road Risky Behaviors of Spanish Children and Adolescents: Findings from a National Study.道路安全教育对西班牙儿童和青少年道路危险行为的影响:一项全国性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 12;15(12):2828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122828.
3
Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors.
学校中的行为健康:道路安全教育中的三项能力是否会影响西班牙儿童的保护道路行为?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;17(3):935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030935.
性别真的重要吗?一个解释风险和积极循环行为的结构方程模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
4
Determinants of seat belt use behaviour: a protocol for a systematic review.安全带使用行为的决定因素:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 3;8(5):e020348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020348.
5
The influence of common method bias on the relationship of the socio-ecological model in predicting physical activity behavior.共同方法偏差对社会生态模型预测身体活动行为关系的影响。
Health Promot Perspect. 2018 Jan 7;8(1):41-45. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2018.05. eCollection 2018.
6
Young drivers and their cars: Safe and sound or the perfect storm?年轻司机及其汽车:安全无虞还是完美风暴?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Road traffic injuries among children and adolescents in Singapore - Who is at greatest risk?新加坡儿童和青少年的道路交通伤害——谁面临的风险最大?
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Gender Effects in Young Road Users on Road Safety Attitudes, Behaviors and Risk Perception.年轻道路使用者在道路安全态度、行为和风险认知方面的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01412. eCollection 2016.
9
An educational intervention in road safety among children and teenagers in Mexico.墨西哥针对儿童和青少年开展的道路安全教育干预措施。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):164-170. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1224344. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests.多群组 SEM 下的测量不变性:卡方差异检验的问题与解决方案。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):405-26. doi: 10.1037/met0000080. Epub 2016 Jun 6.