• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C1与C2的比值是评估寰椎骨折移位和横韧带损伤的一种潜在工具。

C1:C2 ratio is a potential tool assessing atlas fracture displacement and transverse ligament injury.

作者信息

Lin Peny, Chuang Tim Chung-Hsien, Baker Joseph F

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):139-144. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_59_19.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_59_19
PMID:31772425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6868536/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of a C1:C2 ratio in a cohort of patients with atlas fractures. Second, we aimed to consider the utility of the C1:C2 ratio with regard to diagnosis of transverse ligament (TL) injury.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Patients with atlas fractures in the Waikato region between 2008 and 2010 were identified retrospectively through clinical coding and collated radiology trauma database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The maximal width of C1 and C2 was measured using the first-taken trauma radiograph series. Combined overhang of lateral masses (△mm) and a C1:C2 ratio was then calculated. Final ratio and atlanto-dens interval (ADI) were measured at the last clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with full radiographic records were included. Of these, five patients (21%) had TL injuries confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. No patient with a ratio 1.15 had an intact TL, whereas a ratio of >1.10 captured 80% of TL injuries. The ratio ( < 0.001) and delta values ( < 0.001) were statistically significantly different between TL-injured and TL-intact cohorts. Two patients in the TL injury group demonstrated increased ADI on final follow-up with a ratio of >1.10.

CONCLUSIONS

A C1:C2 ratio >1.10 on plain radiographs showed a sensitivity of 80% in detecting atlas fractures with associated TL injury. All patients with a ratio of ≥1.15 had TL rupture subsequently confirmed by an advanced modality. A ratio calculation on radiographs is a potentially useful method of describing atlas lateral mass displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定一组寰椎骨折患者中C1:C2比值的可靠性。其次,我们旨在探讨C1:C2比值在诊断横韧带(TL)损伤方面的实用性。

设计

这是一项回顾性分析。

方法

通过临床编码和整理放射学创伤数据库,对2008年至2010年怀卡托地区的寰椎骨折患者进行回顾性识别。

主要观察指标

使用首次拍摄的创伤X线片系列测量C1和C2的最大宽度。然后计算侧块联合悬垂(△mm)和C1:C2比值。在最后一次临床随访时测量最终比值和寰齿间隙(ADI)。

结果

共纳入24例有完整影像学记录的患者。其中,5例(21%)经计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像证实有TL损伤。C1:C2比值≤1.15的患者中无一例TL完整,而比值>1.10可发现80%的TL损伤。TL损伤组和TL完整组之间的比值(<0.001)和差值(<0.001)在统计学上有显著差异。TL损伤组中有2例患者在最终随访时ADI增加,比值>1.10。

结论

X线平片上C1:C2比值>1.10在检测伴有TL损伤的寰椎骨折时敏感性为80%。所有比值≥1.15的患者随后经高级影像学检查证实有TL断裂。X线片上的比值计算是描述寰椎侧块移位的一种潜在有用方法。

证据级别

三级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f97/6868536/3c649602a4c2/JCVJS-10-139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f97/6868536/70b8e529085b/JCVJS-10-139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f97/6868536/3c649602a4c2/JCVJS-10-139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f97/6868536/70b8e529085b/JCVJS-10-139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f97/6868536/3c649602a4c2/JCVJS-10-139-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
C1:C2 ratio is a potential tool assessing atlas fracture displacement and transverse ligament injury.C1与C2的比值是评估寰椎骨折移位和横韧带损伤的一种潜在工具。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):139-144. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_59_19.
2
A retrospective review of fixation of C1 ring fractures--does the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) really matter?寰椎(C1)环骨折固定术的回顾性研究——寰椎横韧带(TAL)真的重要吗?
Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.041. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
3
Appropriateness of Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation and Management of C1 Jefferson Fractures.颈椎磁共振成像在 C1 型 Jefferson 骨折评估和管理中的适宜性。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e137-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.117. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
[Combined atlantoaxial fractures].[寰枢椎联合骨折]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(2):105-10.
5
[Injuries of the atlas].[寰椎损伤]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(5):274-8.
6
Posterior osteosynthesis with monoaxial lateral mass screw-rod system for unstable C1 burst fractures.后路单轴侧块钉棒系统治疗不稳定型 C1 爆裂骨折。
Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screws and crosslink compression fixation for unstable atlas fracture.C1 侧块-C2 椎弓根螺钉和交叉链接压缩固定治疗不稳定寰椎骨折。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2505-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4009a.
8
Utility of Anterior Atlantodens Interval Widening on Cervical Spine CT for Assessing Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury.颈椎CT上前寰齿间隙增宽在评估寰椎横韧带损伤中的应用价值
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2319-2326. doi: 10.1177/21925682221081211. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
9
"Rule of Spence" and Dickman's Classification of Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury Revisited: Discrepancy of Prediction on Atlantoaxial Stability Based on Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Treatment for Atlas Fractures.“斯宾塞法则”与狄克曼寰枢横韧带损伤分类的再探讨:基于寰椎骨折非手术治疗的临床转归对寰枢稳定性预测的差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):E306-E314. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002877.
10
Self-designed posterior atlas polyaxial lateral mass screw-plate fixation for unstable atlas fracture.自行设计的后路寰椎多轴侧块螺钉钢板固定治疗不稳定型寰椎骨折。
Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.020. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of isolated C1 fractures: A systematic review.孤立性C1骨折的诊断与治疗:一项系统综述。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):233-244. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_61_22. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
"Rule of Spence" and Dickman's Classification of Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury Revisited: Discrepancy of Prediction on Atlantoaxial Stability Based on Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Treatment for Atlas Fractures.“斯宾塞法则”与狄克曼寰枢横韧带损伤分类的再探讨:基于寰椎骨折非手术治疗的临床转归对寰枢稳定性预测的差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):E306-E314. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002877.
2
C1 fractures: a review of diagnoses, management options, and outcomes.C1骨折:诊断、治疗选择及预后综述
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Sep;9(3):255-62. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9356-5.
3
Comparison of CT versus MRI measurements of transverse atlantal ligament integrity in craniovertebral junction injuries. Part 1: A clinical study.
颅颈交界区损伤中寰椎横韧带完整性的CT与MRI测量比较。第1部分:临床研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):897-902. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.SPINE13808. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
4
Bifid Anterior and Posterior Arches of Atlas: Surgical Implication and Analysis of 70 Cases.寰椎前、后弓裂:70例手术意义及分析
Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug;77(2):296-305; discussion 305-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000761.
5
Does C₁ fracture displacement correlate with transverse ligament integrity?C₁ 骨折移位与横韧带完整性相关吗?
Orthop Surg. 2013 May;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/os.12034.
6
Management of isolated fractures of the atlas in adults.成人寰椎孤立性骨折的治疗
Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar;72 Suppl 2:127-31. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318276ee2a.
7
Atlas fractures.寰枢椎骨折。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3 Suppl):60-7. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000366108.02499.8F.
8
Cervical spine trauma.颈椎创伤。
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005 Spring;14(1):8-16.
9
A biomechanical study of Jefferson fractures.Jefferson骨折的生物力学研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 1;23(17):1832-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809010-00005.
10
Injuries involving the transverse atlantal ligament: classification and treatment guidelines based upon experience with 39 injuries.涉及寰椎横韧带的损伤:基于39例损伤经验的分类及治疗指南
Neurosurgery. 1996 Jan;38(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199601000-00012.