Research Institute of General Surgery, Jinling Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, No.305, Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, No.321, Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2645-9.
This study examined the feasibility of transabdominal intestinal ultrasonography in evaluating acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI).
A total of 116 patients were included. Intestinal ultrasonography was conducted daily within 1 week after admission to the intensive care unit. Ultrasonography indicators including intestinal diameter, changes in the intestinal folds, thickness of the intestinal wall, stratification of the intestinal wall, and intestinal peristalsis (movement of the intestinal contents) were observed to determine the acute gastrointestinal injury ultrasonography (AGIUS) score. The gastrointestinal and urinary tract sonography ultrasound (GUTS) protocol score was also calculated. During the first week of the study, the gastrointestinal failure (GIF) score was determined daily. The correlations between transabdominal intestinal scores (AGIUS and GUTS) and the GIF score were analyzed to clarify the feasibility of evaluating AGI through observation of the intestine. The utility of intestinal ultrasonography indicators in predicting feeding intolerance was investigated to improve the ability of clinicians to manage AGI.
A total of 751 ultrasonic examinations were performed with 511 images (68%) considered to be of "good quality." AGIUS and GUTS scores differed significantly between AGI patients (GIF score 0-2) and non-AGI patients (GIF score 3-4) (p < 0.001). Both scores correlated positively with GIF score (r = 0.54, p < 0.001; r = 0.66, p < 0.001). These ultrasonography indicators could predict feeding intolerance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.60 (0.48-0.71; intestinal diameter), 0.76 (0.67-0.85; intestinal folds), 0.71 (0.62-0.80; wall thickness), 0.77 (0.69-0.86; wall stratification), and 0.78 (0.68-0.88; intestinal peristalsis). Compared to patients with a normal rate of peristalsis (5-10/min), patients with abnormal peristalsis rates (< 5/min or > 10/min) have increased risk for feeding intolerance (16/83 vs. 25/33, p < 0.001).
The transabdominal intestinal ultrasonography represents an effective means for assessing gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients. Intestinal ultrasonography indicators, especially the degree of intestinal peristalsis, may be used to predict feeding intolerance.
ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03589248. Registered 04 July 2018-retrospectively registered.
本研究旨在探讨经腹肠超声在评估急性胃肠损伤(AGI)中的可行性。
共纳入 116 例患者。患者入住重症监护病房后 1 周内每天进行肠超声检查。观察肠超声指标,包括肠径、肠襞变化、肠壁厚度、肠壁分层和肠蠕动(肠内容物的运动),以确定急性胃肠损伤超声(AGIUS)评分。同时计算胃肠道和泌尿系统超声(GUTS)方案评分。在研究的第一周内,每天确定胃肠衰竭(GIF)评分。分析经腹肠评分(AGIUS 和 GUTS)与 GIF 评分之间的相关性,以明确通过观察肠道来评估 AGI 的可行性。研究还探讨了肠超声指标在预测喂养不耐受方面的作用,以提高临床医生管理 AGI 的能力。
共进行了 751 次超声检查,其中 511 次(68%)图像被认为“质量良好”。AGI 患者(GIF 评分 0-2)与非 AGI 患者(GIF 评分 3-4)的 AGIUS 和 GUTS 评分差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。两个评分均与 GIF 评分呈正相关(r=0.54,p<0.001;r=0.66,p<0.001)。这些超声指标可预测喂养不耐受,受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.60(0.48-0.71;肠径)、0.76(0.67-0.85;肠襞)、0.71(0.62-0.80;肠壁厚度)、0.77(0.69-0.86;肠壁分层)和 0.78(0.68-0.88;肠蠕动)。与蠕动频率正常(5-10 次/分)的患者相比,蠕动频率异常(<5 次/分或>10 次/分)的患者喂养不耐受的风险增加(16/83 比 25/33,p<0.001)。
经腹肠超声检查是评估危重症患者胃肠损伤的有效方法。肠超声指标,尤其是肠蠕动程度,可用于预测喂养不耐受。
ClinicalTrial.gov,NCT03589248。2018 年 7 月 4 日注册-回顾性注册。