• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项混合方法研究,考察了医院出院期间跨专业团队的团队共享心智模型。

A mixed methods study examining teamwork shared mental models of interprofessional teams during hospital discharge.

机构信息

National Clinician Scholar, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jun;29(6):499-508. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009716. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009716
PMID:31776201
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how team processes impact providers' abilities to prepare patients for a safe hospital discharge. Teamwork Shared Mental Models (teamwork-SMMs) are the teams' organised understanding of individual member's roles, interactions and behaviours needed to perform a task like hospital discharge. Teamwork-SMMs are linked to team effectiveness in other fields, but have not been readily investigated in healthcare. This study examines teamwork-SMMs to understand how interprofessional teams coordinate care when discharging patients.

METHODS

This mixed methods study examined teamwork-SMMs of inpatient interprofessional discharge teams at a single hospital. For each discharge event, we collected data from the patient and their discharge team (nurse, physician and coordinator) using interviews and questionnaires. We quantitatively determined the discharge teams' teamwork-SMM components of quality and convergence using the Shared Mental Model Scale, and then explored their relationships to patient-reported preparation for posthospital care. We used qualitative thematic analysis of narrative cases to examine the contextual differences of discharge teams with higher versus lower teamwork-SMMs.

RESULTS

The sample included a total of 106 structured patient interviews, 192 provider day-of-discharge questionnaires and 430 observation hours to examine 64 discharge events. We found that inpatient teams with better teamwork-SMMs (ie, higher perceptions of teamwork quality or greater convergence) were more effective at preparing patients for post-hospital care. Additionally, teams with high and low teamwork-SMMs had different experiences with team cohesion, communication openness and alignment on the patient situation.

CONCLUSIONS

Examining the quality and agreement of teamwork-SMMs among teams provides a better understanding of how teams coordinate care and may facilitate the development of specific team-based interventions to improve patient care at hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

对于团队流程如何影响提供者为患者安全出院做准备的能力知之甚少。团队共享心智模型(teamwork-SMMs)是团队对执行任务(如出院)所需的各个成员的角色、互动和行为的组织理解。团队-SMMs 与其他领域的团队有效性相关,但在医疗保健领域尚未得到广泛研究。本研究通过考察团队-SMMs 来了解多专业团队在为患者出院时如何协调护理工作。

方法

本混合方法研究考察了一家医院的住院跨专业出院团队的团队-SMMs。对于每个出院事件,我们使用访谈和问卷从患者及其出院团队(护士、医生和协调员)收集数据。我们使用共享心智模型量表定量确定了出院团队的团队-SMM 质量和收敛组件,然后探讨了它们与患者报告的出院后护理准备情况之间的关系。我们使用叙述性案例的定性主题分析来考察具有较高和较低团队-SMMs 的出院团队之间的背景差异。

结果

样本包括总共 106 次结构化患者访谈、192 次提供者出院日问卷调查和 430 个观察小时,以考察 64 次出院事件。我们发现,具有更好的团队-SMMs(即,更高的团队工作质量或更大的收敛性)的住院团队更能有效地为患者出院后的护理做好准备。此外,具有高和低团队-SMMs 的团队在团队凝聚力、沟通开放性以及对患者情况的一致性方面有不同的体验。

结论

考察团队之间团队-SMMs 的质量和一致性可以更好地了解团队如何协调护理工作,并可能有助于开发特定的基于团队的干预措施,以改善患者在出院时的护理。

相似文献

1
A mixed methods study examining teamwork shared mental models of interprofessional teams during hospital discharge.一项混合方法研究,考察了医院出院期间跨专业团队的团队共享心智模型。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jun;29(6):499-508. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009716. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
2
Ready to Go Home? Assessment of Shared Mental Models of the Patient and Discharging Team Regarding Readiness for Hospital Discharge.准备好回家了吗?评估患者和出院团队对出院准备情况的共享心理模型。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Jun;16(6):326-332. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3464.
3
Are We on the Same Page? Shared Mental Models to Support Clinical Teamwork Among Health Professions Learners: A Scoping Review.我们在同一页上吗?共享心理模型以支持卫生专业学习者的临床团队合作:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):498-509. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002019.
4
Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.跨专业团队成员的满意度:智利一家医院的混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z.
5
Factors Influencing Team Behaviors in Surgery: A Qualitative Study to Inform Teamwork Interventions.影响手术团队行为的因素:一项定性研究以提供团队合作干预措施的信息。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.12.045. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Understanding intra- and interprofessional team and teamwork processes by exploring facility-based neonatal care in kenyan hospitals.通过探索肯尼亚医院基于机构的新生儿护理来理解内部和跨专业团队以及团队合作过程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 13;22(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08039-6.
8
Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.低危环境下的跨专业团队合作认知:定性分析。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12424.
9
The impact of organisational and individual factors on team communication in surgery: a qualitative study.组织因素和个体因素对手术团队沟通的影响:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):732-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
10
Exploring Shared Mental Models of Surgical Teams in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy.探讨胸腔镜肺叶切除术手术团队的共享心理模型。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):954-961. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Can handoffs bridge the interprofessional divide to build a team?交接能否弥合跨专业分歧以建立团队?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018816.
2
What influences preparations of discharge documentation at patient discharge? An interview study with hospital health professionals based on the theoretical domains framework.患者出院时,哪些因素会影响出院文件的准备工作?一项基于理论领域框架对医院卫生专业人员进行的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):e090753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090753.
3
A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.
针对预期接受急性后护理的老年人,在住院环境中对价值目标引出工具进行的混合方法可用性预试验。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251332131. doi: 10.1177/00469580251332131. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
4
Bringing team science to the ambulatory diagnostic process: how do patients and clinicians develop shared mental models?将团队科学引入门诊诊断过程:患者和临床医生如何形成共享心智模型?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 21;12(1):25-34. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0115. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.
5
Synergizing Safety: A Customized Approach to Curtailing Unplanned Extubations through Shared Decision-making in the NICU.协同保障安全:一种通过新生儿重症监护室的共同决策来减少意外拔管的定制方法。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024 May 9;9(3):e729. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000729. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
6
Organizational Intent, Organizational Structures, and Reviewer Mental Models Influence Mortality Review Processes.组织意图、组织结构和评审人员的心智模式会影响死亡率评审过程。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Oct 29;7(6):515-523. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.004. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
The Effect of the Application of the Team-STEPPS-Based Preceptorship Guidance Model on the Competence of Nursing Students.基于团队策略强化知识与技能的临床带教指导模式对护生能力的影响
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 28;14:817-826. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S416847. eCollection 2023.
8
Study protocol: Type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation study implementing Age-Friendly evidence-based practices in the VA to improve outcomes in older adults.研究方案:III型混合有效性-实施性研究,在退伍军人事务部实施基于循证实践的老年友好型措施,以改善老年人的治疗效果。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 May 25;4(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00431-5.
9
Surgical team dynamics in a reflective team meeting to improve quality of care: qualitative analysis of a shared mental model.反思性团队会议中改善医疗质量的手术团队动态:共享心智模型的定性分析
Br J Surg. 2023 Sep 6;110(10):1271-1275. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad111.
10
Two mental models of integrated care for advanced liver disease: qualitative study of multidisciplinary health professionals.两种先进肝脏疾病综合护理的心理模型:多学科卫生专业人员的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 5;12(9):e062836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062836.