Khorvash Farzin, Yaghoubi Shoeleh, Farsaei Shadi, Ataei Behrooz, Hakamifard Atousa, Mohajeri Fatemeh, Gudarzi Mohsen
Acquired Immunodeficiency Research Center, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of infectious disease, School of medicine, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2020;41(1):97-105. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2019.1696818. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a puzzling issue for infectious disease specialist. The present clinical trial study was aimed to comparing the effects of injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin and injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin on management of patients with VAP due to multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter. VAP patients were randomly divided into two groups ( = 30/each): Group 1 - patients that received intravenous (IV) meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized colistin, as a routine treatment, and Group 2 - patients that received IV meropenem, injectable colistin plus nebulized tobramycin. A total of 14 days of therapeutic intervention are required for every case. Follow-up for subjects was performed at five time-points: days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after intervention. Also, a mean of creatinine levels of patients was determined in five times. In the present study, the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) was determined on the basis of points assigned for various clinically manifestations of VAP. Based on our statistical analysis, there was no significant difference between CPIS and creatinine level in both Groups 1 and 2 ( > .05). CPIS and other clinical investigation appeared effectiveness of the treatment with injected colistin plus nebulized tobramycin; on the other hand, the results of present clinical trial showed that aforementioned therapeutic approach can be used as an alternative treatment for the management of infection in VAP patients.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的管理对于传染病专家来说是一个棘手的问题。本临床试验旨在比较注射用黏菌素加雾化黏菌素与注射用黏菌素加雾化妥布霉素对耐多药不动杆菌所致VAP患者的治疗效果。VAP患者被随机分为两组(每组 = 30例):第1组患者接受静脉注射美罗培南、注射用黏菌素加雾化黏菌素作为常规治疗,第2组患者接受静脉注射美罗培南、注射用黏菌素加雾化妥布霉素。每例患者均需进行14天的治疗干预。在干预后的第1、3、5、7和14天这五个时间点对受试者进行随访。此外,还五次测定了患者的肌酐水平均值。在本研究中,临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)是根据VAP各种临床表现所分配的分数来确定的。根据我们的统计分析,第1组和第2组的CPIS和肌酐水平均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。CPIS和其他临床研究表明注射用黏菌素加雾化妥布霉素的治疗是有效的;另一方面,本临床试验结果表明上述治疗方法可作为VAP患者感染管理的替代治疗方法。