Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Department of Visualization, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Nov;3(11):e460-e468. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30217-7.
The association between urban greenspace and mortality risk is well known, but less is known about how the spatial arrangement of greenspace affects population health. We aimed to investigate the relation between urban greenspace distribution and mortality risk.
We did a cross-sectional study in Philadelphia, PA, USA, using high-resolution landcover data for 2008 from the Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access database. We calculated landscape metrics to measure the greenness, fragmentation, connectedness, aggregation, and shape of greenspace, including and omitting green areas 83·6 m or smaller, using Geographical Information System and spatial pattern analysis programs. We analysed all-cause and cause-specific mortality (related to heart disease, chronic lower respiratory diseases, and neoplasms) recorded in 2006 for 369 census tracts (small geographical areas with a population of 2500-8000 people). We did negative binomial regression and principal component analyses to assess associations between landscape spatial metrics and mortality, controlling for geographical, demographic, and socioeconomic factors.
A 1% increase in the percentage of greenspace was predicted to reduce all-cause mortality by 0·419% (95% CI 0·050-0·777), with no effect on cause-specific mortality. All-cause mortality was negatively associated with the area of greenspace. A 1 m increase in the mean area of greenspace led to a 0·011% (95% CI 0·004-0·018) fall in all-cause mortality and a 0·019% (0·007-0·032) decrease in cardiac mortality; considering only green areas larger than 83·6 m would contribute to a 0·002% (95% CI 0·001-0·003) decrease in all-cause mortality and a 0·003% (0·001-0·006) reduction in cardiac deaths. Census tracts with more connected, aggregated, coherent, and complex shape greenspaces had a lower risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. The negative association between articulated landscape parcels and all-cause mortality varied with age and education, such that the relation was stronger for census tracts with a higher percentage of older and less well-educated adults.
A significant modest association exists between the spatial distribution of greenspace in cities and mortality risk. The overall amount of greenspace alone is probably failing to capture significant variance in local health outcomes and, thus, environment-based health planning should consider the shape, form, and function of greenspace.
None.
城市绿地与死亡率风险之间的关联已广为人知,但绿地空间布局如何影响人口健康的问题却鲜为人知。本研究旨在探究城市绿地分布与死亡率风险之间的关系。
我们在美国宾夕法尼亚州费城进行了一项横断面研究,使用宾夕法尼亚州空间数据访问数据库中 2008 年的高分辨率土地覆盖数据。我们使用地理信息系统和空间模式分析程序计算景观指标,以衡量绿地的绿色度、破碎度、连接度、聚集度和形状,包括和不包括 83.6 米或更小的绿地面积。我们分析了 2006 年记录的 369 个普查区(人口在 2500 至 8000 人之间的小地理区域)的全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率(与心脏病、慢性下呼吸道疾病和肿瘤有关)。我们采用负二项回归和主成分分析来评估景观空间指标与死亡率之间的关联,同时控制地理、人口统计学和社会经济因素。
预计绿地百分比增加 1%,全因死亡率将降低 0.419%(95%CI 0.050-0.777),但对死因特异性死亡率没有影响。全因死亡率与绿地面积呈负相关。绿地平均面积每增加 1 米,全因死亡率将降低 0.011%(95%CI 0.004-0.018),心脏病死亡率降低 0.019%(0.007-0.032);仅考虑大于 83.6 米的绿地面积,全因死亡率将降低 0.002%(95%CI 0.001-0.003),心脏病死亡率降低 0.003%(0.001-0.006)。具有更多连接、聚集、连贯和复杂形状绿地的普查区全因和死因特异性死亡率较低。结构良好的景观斑块与全因死亡率之间的负相关关系因年龄和教育程度而异,对于老年和受教育程度较低的成年人比例较高的普查区,这种关系更强。
城市绿地空间分布与死亡率风险之间存在显著的适度关联。仅绿地的总体数量可能无法捕捉到当地健康结果的显著差异,因此,基于环境的健康规划应考虑绿地的形状、形式和功能。
无。