• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同固位力的Locator附着体对两种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿稳定性的影响

Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.

作者信息

Liu Wei, Zhang Xin, Qing Hai, Wang Jian

机构信息

Postgraduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.

Doctoral student, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.005
PMID:31780109
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The LOCATOR system has been widely used for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures (2-MOs), but the influence of different LOCATOR attachments on the stability of 2-MOs has not been assessed.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the stability of 2-MOs anchored by LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An edentulous mandibular test cast with 2 bone-level implants inserted in the left and right mandibular canine regions was used. Twelve overdentures were then fabricated and anchored on the cast, following the instructions of the LOCATOR system. By replacing inserts of the 12 overdentures, the stability of 3 groups of LOCATOR inserts with different retentive forces was evaluated: blue group, pink group, and transparent group. With artificial saliva used on the cast and overdentures, vertical forces of 40 N, 55 N, and 100 N were loaded on the occlusal surface of the left incisor, left canine, and left molar, respectively. Under each loading condition, the vertical displacements at the loading point and the vertical and horizontal displacements of overdentures at the right distal edge were measured at the same time. One-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test were used to compare the stability of 2-MOs with different LOCATOR attachments (α=.05 for all tests).

RESULTS

When a force of 40 N was applied to the incisor, the largest vertical movement of the incisor loading point appeared in the blue group (P<.05), and the displacements of the pink group showed significant difference from those of the transparent group (P>.05). When 55 N was loaded on the canine, the blue group showed the largest vertical displacements of both the loading point and the right distal edge of the overdentures (P<.05). No significant difference was found in the vertical displacements between the pink group and the transparent group (P>.05). When a force of 100 N was loaded on the molar point, the transparent group indicated a smaller movement in the vertical direction at the edge of the overdentures than the blue group (P<.05) or the pink group (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces had a significant effect on the denture stability of 2-MOs. Compared with the blue inserts, the pink and transparent inserts can offer greater stability for 2-MOs and could therefore be suggested for clinical situations.

摘要

问题陈述

定位器系统已广泛应用于双种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿(2-MOs),但不同定位器附着体对2-MOs稳定性的影响尚未得到评估。

目的

本体外研究的目的是调查由具有不同固位力的定位器附着体固定的2-MOs的稳定性。

材料与方法

使用一个无牙下颌试验模型,在左右下颌尖牙区植入2枚骨水平种植体。然后按照定位器系统的说明制作12副覆盖义齿并固定在模型上。通过更换12副覆盖义齿的嵌体,评估3组具有不同固位力的定位器嵌体的稳定性:蓝色组、粉色组和透明组。在模型和覆盖义齿上使用人工唾液,分别在左中切牙、左尖牙和左磨牙的咬合面上施加40 N、55 N和100 N的垂直力。在每种加载条件下,同时测量加载点处的垂直位移以及覆盖义齿右远端边缘处的垂直和水平位移。采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey真实显著性差异(HSD)检验来比较不同定位器附着体的2-MOs的稳定性(所有检验的α = 0.05)。

结果

当在中切牙上施加40 N的力时,蓝色组中切牙加载点的垂直移动最大(P < 0.05),粉色组的位移与透明组的位移有显著差异(P > 0.05)。当在尖牙上施加55 N的力时,蓝色组在覆盖义齿加载点和右远端边缘处的垂直位移均最大(P < 0.05)。粉色组和透明组之间的垂直位移无显著差异(P > 0.05)。当在磨牙上施加100 N的力时,透明组在覆盖义齿边缘处的垂直方向移动比蓝色组(P < 0.05)或粉色组(P < 0.05)小。

结论

具有不同固位力的定位器附着体对2-MOs的义齿稳定性有显著影响。与蓝色嵌体相比,粉色和透明嵌体可为2-MOs提供更高的稳定性,因此可推荐用于临床情况。

相似文献

1
Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.不同固位力的Locator附着体对两种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿稳定性的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.种植体数量对下颌种植覆盖义齿移动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):380-385. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
3
Effect of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant-supported overdentures under biting force: An in-vitro study.种植体数量对咬合力作用下下颌种植体支持覆盖义齿移动的影响:一项体外研究。
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(9):709-717. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a40767.
4
[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].使用两种不同附着体的四颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 9;54(1):41-45. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.01.008.
5
The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.上颌无支架种植体数量和分布对种植覆盖义齿负荷传递的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Jun;107(6):358-65. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60090-0.
6
Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.基于种植体位置的两种种植体支持覆盖义齿的固位和稳定性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 10.
7
Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.不同下颌覆盖义齿Locator 附着体脱位力与种植体末端倾斜角度的关系:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e666-e674. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12710. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study.模拟咀嚼对种植体支持覆盖义齿Locator 附着体固位力的影响:一项体外初步研究。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Jan;29(1):74-79. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12670. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.种植体角度和附着结构对Locator附着式覆盖义齿固位力的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1053-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3401.
10
Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.使用不同类型弹性附着体的种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿的固位和稳定性:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1040-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4544.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the wear pattern of two attachment systems of dissimilar materials for mandibular implant-retained overdentures: an in-vitro study.两种不同材料下颌种植覆盖义齿附着体系统的磨损模式的定量和定性评估:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 30;23(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03693-6.
2
Factors influencing retention and durability of attachments for overdentures - adverse effects of cleansings, pH, and temperature: A systematic review.影响覆盖义齿附着体固位和耐久性的因素——清洁、pH值和温度的不良影响:一项系统评价
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 17;8(12):e12411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12411. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
The effect of ball versus locator attachment system on the performance of implant supported overdenture: A systematic review.
球帽式与Locator附着系统对种植体支持覆盖义齿性能的影响:一项系统评价。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;13(1):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
A Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Implant-Retained Overdenture Based on Precision Attachment Type.基于精密附着类型的种植体支持覆盖义齿生物力学性能比较
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 17;14(10):2598. doi: 10.3390/ma14102598.
5
Ball versus Locator Attachments: A Retrospective Study on Prosthetic Maintenance and Effect on Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life.球帽式与定位器式附着体:关于义齿维护及其对口腔健康相关生活质量影响的回顾性研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;14(4):1051. doi: 10.3390/ma14041051.