THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 27;9(11):e031771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031771.
To identify and learn from efforts to design and implement a standardised policy for labelling of invasive tubing and lines across a regional health system.
Single case study involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis.
A devolved health system in the UK National Health Service (NHS).
NHS staff (n=10) and policy-makers (n=8) who were involved in the design and/or implementation of the standardised policy.
Though standardising labelling of invasive tubing and lines was initially seen as a common-sense technical change, challenges during the process of developing and implementing the policy were multiple and sociotechnical in nature. Major challenges related to defining the problem and the solution, limited sustained engagement with stakeholders and users, prototyping/piloting of the solution, and planning for implementation. Some frontline staff remained unconvinced of the need for or value of the policy, since they either did not believe that there was a problem or did not agree that standardised labelling was the right solution. Mundane practical issues such authorisation and resourcing, supply chains for labels, the need to restructure work practices to accommodate the new standard, and the physical features of the labels in specific clinical settings all had important impacts.
Newly standardised tools and practices have to fit within a system of pre-existing norms, practices and procedures. We identified a number of practical, social and cultural challenges when designing and implementing a standardised policy in a regional healthcare system. Taking account of both sociocultural and technical aspects of standardisation, combined with systems thinking, could lead to more effective implementation and increase acceptability and usability of new standards.
识别并借鉴在区域卫生系统中设计和实施侵入性管和线标签标准化政策的经验。
涉及定性访谈和文献分析的单一案例研究。
英国国民保健制度(NHS)中的分权卫生系统。
参与设计和/或实施标准化政策的 NHS 工作人员(n=10)和政策制定者(n=8)。
尽管标准化侵入性管和线的标签最初被视为常识性的技术变革,但在制定和实施政策的过程中,面临的挑战是多方面的,具有社会性和技术性。主要挑战涉及定义问题和解决方案、与利益相关者和用户的有限持续参与、解决方案的原型设计/试点以及实施计划。一些一线工作人员仍然对政策的必要性或价值持怀疑态度,因为他们要么不认为存在问题,要么不同意标准化标签是正确的解决方案。一些平凡的实际问题,如授权和资源、标签的供应链、为适应新标准而重组工作实践的需要,以及特定临床环境下标签的物理特性,都产生了重要影响。
新标准化的工具和实践必须适应现有规范、实践和程序的系统。我们在区域医疗保健系统中设计和实施标准化政策时,发现了一些实际的、社会的和文化的挑战。考虑到标准化的社会文化和技术方面,并结合系统思维,可能会导致更有效的实施,并提高新标准的可接受性和可用性。