Lamé Guillaume, Komashie Alexander, Sinnott Carol, Bashford Tom
Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Génie Industriel, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Health Systems Design Group, Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Future Healthc J. 2024 Feb 29;11(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100008. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Bad design in safety-critical environments like healthcare can lead to users being frustrated, excluded or injured. In contrast, good design can make it easier to use a service correctly, with impacts on both the safety and efficiency of healthcare delivery, as well as the experience of patients and staff. The participative dimension of design as an improvement strategy has recently gained traction in the healthcare quality improvement literature. However, the role of design expertise and professional design has been much less explored. Good design does not happen by accident: it takes expertise and the specific reasoning that expert designers develop through practical experience and training. Here, we define design, show why poor design can be disastrous and illustrate the benefits of good design. We argue for the recognition of distinctive design expertise and describe some of its characteristics. Finally, we discuss how design could be better promoted in healthcare improvement.
在医疗保健等对安全至关重要的环境中,糟糕的设计可能会导致用户感到沮丧、被排斥或受伤。相比之下,良好的设计可以使正确使用服务变得更加容易,这对医疗服务的安全性和效率以及患者和工作人员的体验都会产生影响。作为一种改进策略,设计的参与维度最近在医疗质量改进文献中受到了关注。然而,设计专业知识和专业设计的作用却很少被探讨。好的设计并非偶然发生:它需要专业知识以及专业设计师通过实践经验和培训所形成的特定推理能力。在这里,我们定义设计,说明糟糕的设计为何可能是灾难性的,并阐述良好设计的益处。我们主张认可独特的设计专业知识,并描述其一些特征。最后,我们讨论如何在医疗保健改进中更好地推广设计。