Di Simplicio Martina, Lau-Zhu Alex, Meluken Iselin, Taylor Patrick, Kessing Lars Vedel, Vinberg Maj, Holmes Emily Alexandra, Miskowiak Kamilla Woznica
Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 8;10:801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00801. eCollection 2019.
Mental imagery abnormalities feature across affective disorders including bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar depression (UD). Maladaptive emotional imagery has been proposed as a maintenance factor for affective symptomatology and a target for mechanism-driven psychological treatment developments. Where imagery abnormalities feature beyond acute affective episodes, further opportunities for innovation arise beyond treatments, such as for tertiary/relapse prevention (e.g., in remitted individuals) or primary prevention (e.g., in non-affected but at-risk individuals). The aim of our study was to investigate for the first time the presence of possible mental imagery abnormalities in affected individuals in remission and at-risk individuals for affective disorders using a familial risk design. A population-based cohort of monozygotic twins was recruited through linkage between the Danish national registries (=204). Participants were grouped as: affected (remitted BD/UD; = 115); high-risk (co-twin with history of BD/UD; = 49), or low-risk (no co-twin history of BD/UD; = 40). Twins completed mental imagery measures spanning key subjective domains (spontaneous imagery use and emotional imagery) and cognitive domains (imagery inspection and imagery manipulation). Affected twins in remission reported enhanced emotional mental imagery compared to both low- and high-risk twins. This was characterized by greater impact of i) intrusive prospective imagery (Impact of Future Events Scale) and ii) deliberately-generated prospective imagery of negative scenarios (Prospective Imagery Task). There were no significant differences in these key measures between affected BD and UD twins in remission. Additionally, low- and high-risk twins did not significantly differ on these emotional imagery measures. There were also no significant differences between the three groups on non-emotional measures including spontaneous imagery use and cognitive stages of imagery. Abnormalities in emotional prospective imagery are present in monozygotic twins with affective disorders in remission-despite preserved cognitive stages of imagery-but absent in unaffected high-risk twins, and thus do not appear to index familial risk (i.e., unlikely to qualify as "endophenotypes"). Elevated emotional prospective imagery represents a promising treatment/prevention target in affective disorders.
心理意象异常在包括双相情感障碍(BD)和单相抑郁症(UD)在内的情感障碍中较为常见。适应不良的情绪意象已被提出是情感症状的一个维持因素,也是机制驱动的心理治疗发展的一个靶点。当意象异常在急性情感发作之外出现时,除了治疗之外,还会出现更多的创新机会,例如三级预防/复发预防(如在缓解期个体中)或一级预防(如在未受影响但有风险的个体中)。我们研究的目的是首次使用家族风险设计,调查缓解期受影响个体和情感障碍风险个体中可能存在的心理意象异常。通过丹麦国家登记处之间的联系招募了一个基于人群的同卵双胞胎队列(=204)。参与者被分为:受影响组(缓解期BD/UD;=115);高风险组(有BD/UD病史的双胞胎;=49),或低风险组(无BD/UD双胞胎病史;=40)。双胞胎完成了跨越关键主观领域(自发意象使用和情绪意象)和认知领域(意象检查和意象操作)的心理意象测量。与低风险和高风险双胞胎相比,缓解期的受影响双胞胎报告了增强的情绪心理意象。这表现为:i)侵入性前瞻性意象(未来事件影响量表)和ii)故意生成的负面情景前瞻性意象(前瞻性意象任务)的更大影响。缓解期的受影响BD和UD双胞胎在这些关键测量上没有显著差异。此外,低风险和高风险双胞胎在这些情绪意象测量上也没有显著差异。在包括自发意象使用和意象认知阶段在内的非情绪测量上,三组之间也没有显著差异。情感障碍缓解期同卵双胞胎中存在情绪前瞻性意象异常——尽管意象的认知阶段保持完整——但未受影响的高风险双胞胎中不存在,因此似乎不能作为家族风险的指标(即不太可能符合“内表型”)。情绪前瞻性意象升高是情感障碍中一个有前景的治疗/预防靶点。