Schwarzkopf Daniel, Pausch Christine, Kortgen Andreas, Guenther Albrecht, Reinhart Konrad, Hartog Christiane S
Center for Sepsis Control and Care, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Oct;115(7):600-608. doi: 10.1007/s00063-019-00632-8.
End-of-life (EOL) decision-making is stressful. We conducted a quality improvement initiative to EOL decision-making and reduce stress for clinicians and patients' relatives.
A before-after study running from 2010-2014 at four interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICU) in a German university hospital was performed. Between periods, a multifaceted intervention was implemented to improve timeliness, clinician involvement, and organisational support. Consecutive patients with severe sepsis and therapy limitations were included. Relatives were interviewed by telephone after 90 days to assess their psychological symptoms. Clinician burnout was assessed by staff surveys in each period.
Participation in the pre- and postintervention period was 84/145 and 90/159 among relatives, and 174/284 and 122/297 among ICU clinicians. Staff judged intervention elements as mostly helpful, but implementation of intervention elements was heterogeneous. From pre- to postintervention, relatives' risk of posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety did not change (all p ≥ 0.464). Clinicians' risk of burnout increased (29% vs. 41%, p = 0.05). Relatives were highly satisfied in both periods (median of 9 vs. 9.2 on a 1-10 scale each). Attendings involved residents and nurses more often (both p ≤ 0.018). Nurses more often had sufficient information to talk with relatives (41% vs. 62%, p = 0.002). Time to first EOL decision as well as barriers and facilitators of EOL decision-making did not change.
The intervention may have increased involvement in EOL decision-making, but was accompanied by an increased risk of clinician burnout maybe due to lack of improving communication skills and organisational support. More research is needed to understand which interventions can decrease clinician burnout.
临终(EOL)决策压力很大。我们开展了一项质量改进计划,以改善临终决策并减轻临床医生和患者亲属的压力。
在德国一家大学医院的四个跨学科重症监护病房(ICU)进行了一项2010年至2014年的前后对照研究。在两个时期之间,实施了多方面干预措施,以提高及时性、临床医生的参与度和组织支持。纳入患有严重脓毒症且治疗受限的连续患者。90天后通过电话采访亲属,以评估他们的心理症状。通过各时期的员工调查评估临床医生的职业倦怠情况。
亲属在干预前和干预后的参与率分别为84/145和90/159,ICU临床医生的参与率分别为174/284和122/297。工作人员认为干预措施大多有帮助,但干预措施的实施情况参差不齐。从干预前到干预后,亲属患创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑的风险没有变化(所有p≥0.464)。临床医生的职业倦怠风险增加(29%对41%,p=0.05)。两个时期亲属的满意度都很高(1至10分制下中位数分别为9分和9.2分)。主治医生让住院医生和护士更多地参与进来(p均≤0.018)。护士更经常有足够的信息与亲属交谈(41%对62%,p=0.002)。首次做出临终决策的时间以及临终决策的障碍和促进因素没有变化。
该干预措施可能增加了对临终决策的参与度,但可能由于缺乏沟通技巧的改善和组织支持,导致临床医生职业倦怠风险增加。需要更多研究来了解哪些干预措施可以降低临床医生的职业倦怠。