Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Adv Nutr. 2020 May 1;11(3):697-708. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz125.
Human studies have established a positive association between the intake of industrial trans fatty acids and the development of cardiovascular diseases, leading several countries to enact laws that restrict the presence of industrial trans fatty acids in food products. However, trans fatty acids cannot be completely eliminated from the human diet since they are also naturally present in meat and dairy products of ruminant animals. Moreover, bans on industrial trans fatty acids have not yet been instituted in all countries. The epidemiological evidence against trans fatty acids by far overshadows mechanistic insights that may explain how trans fatty acids achieve their damaging effects. This review focuses on the mechanisms that underlie the deleterious effects of trans fatty acids by juxtaposing effects of trans fatty acids against those of cis-unsaturated fatty acids and saturated fatty acids (SFAs). This review also carefully explores the argument that ruminant trans fatty acids have differential effects from industrial trans fatty acids. Overall, in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate that industrial trans fatty acids promote inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, although to a lesser degree than SFAs, whereas cis-unsaturated fatty acids are protective against ER stress and inflammation. Additionally, industrial trans fatty acids promote fat storage in the liver at the expense of adipose tissue compared with cis-unsaturated fatty acids and SFAs. In cultured hepatocytes and adipocytes, industrial trans fatty acids, but not cis-unsaturated fatty acids or SFAs, stimulate the cholesterol synthesis pathway by activating sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) 2-mediated gene regulation. Interestingly, although industrial and ruminant trans fatty acids show similar effects on human plasma lipoproteins, in preclinical models, only industrial trans fatty acids promote inflammation, ER stress, and cholesterol synthesis. Overall, clearer insight into the molecular mechanisms of action of trans fatty acids may create new therapeutic windows for the treatment of diseases characterized by disrupted lipid metabolism.
人体研究已经证实,摄入工业反式脂肪酸与心血管疾病的发展之间存在正相关关系,这促使许多国家制定法律,限制食品中工业反式脂肪酸的存在。然而,由于反式脂肪酸也存在于反刍动物的肉类和奶制品中,因此它们无法从人类饮食中完全消除。此外,并非所有国家都禁止工业反式脂肪酸。迄今为止,反式脂肪酸的流行病学证据远远超过了可能解释反式脂肪酸如何产生其有害影响的机制见解。本综述通过将反式脂肪酸的作用与顺式不饱和脂肪酸和饱和脂肪酸(SFAs)的作用进行对比,重点关注反式脂肪酸产生有害作用的机制。本综述还仔细探讨了反刍动物反式脂肪酸与工业反式脂肪酸具有不同作用的观点。总的来说,体内和体外研究表明,工业反式脂肪酸会促进炎症和内质网(ER)应激,尽管其程度低于 SFAs,而顺式不饱和脂肪酸则可抵抗 ER 应激和炎症。此外,与顺式不饱和脂肪酸和 SFAs 相比,工业反式脂肪酸会促进肝脏脂肪储存,而不是脂肪组织。在培养的肝细胞和脂肪细胞中,工业反式脂肪酸而非顺式不饱和脂肪酸或 SFAs 通过激活固醇调节元件结合蛋白(SREBP)2 介导的基因调节来刺激胆固醇合成途径。有趣的是,尽管工业和反刍动物反式脂肪酸对人体脂蛋白具有相似的影响,但在临床前模型中,只有工业反式脂肪酸会促进炎症、ER 应激和胆固醇合成。总的来说,对反式脂肪酸作用机制的更清晰认识可能为治疗脂质代谢紊乱的疾病创造新的治疗窗口。