School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 29;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1099-7.
China poverty reduction policy (PRP) addresses two important elements: the targeted poverty reduction (TPA) project since 2015 in line with social assistance policy as national policy; and reducing inequality in health services utilization by making provision of medical financial assistance (MFA). Therefore, this study aims to assess the effects of the PRP in health services utilization (both inpatient and outpatient services) among the central and western rural poor of China.
The study conducted household survey and applied propensity score matching (PSM) method to assess the effects of the PRP on health services utilization among the rural poor of Central and Western China. A sensitivity test was also performed on the PSM results to test their robustness.
Key findings showed 17.6% of respondents were the beneficial of PRP. The average treatment effects on the treated (ATT) of the PRP on the inpatient visits within one year was found significantly positive (P = 0.026).
There has been relationship between PRP with medical financial assistance and reduction of inequality in health services utilization by the poorer, in particular to accessing the inpatient services from the county or township hospitals of China. Policy makers should pay attention for making provision of improving responsiveness of supply, when subsidizing on the demand side.
中国减贫政策(PRP)解决了两个重要因素:自 2015 年以来与社会援助政策一致的有针对性的减贫(TPA)项目作为国家政策;通过提供医疗财政援助(MFA)来减少卫生服务利用方面的不平等。因此,本研究旨在评估 PRP 对中国中西部农村贫困人口卫生服务利用(包括住院和门诊服务)的影响。
本研究进行了家庭调查,并应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)方法来评估 PRP 对中国中西部农村贫困人口卫生服务利用的影响。还对 PSM 结果进行了敏感性测试,以检验其稳健性。
主要发现显示,17.6%的受访者受益于 PRP。PRP 对一年内住院就诊的平均处理效应(ATT)显著为正(P=0.026)。
PRP 与医疗财政援助之间存在关系,通过对贫困人口的补贴,可以减少卫生服务利用方面的不平等,特别是可以从中国的县级或乡镇医院获得住院服务。政策制定者在补贴需求方时,应注意提供提高供应响应性的措施。