• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为研究与创新中的性别平等干预措施制定一个概念性评估框架。

Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation.

作者信息

Kalpazidou Schmidt Evanthia, Graversen Ebbe Krogh

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750. Epub 2019 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750
PMID:31785474
Abstract

In this article, we discuss the development of a conceptual evaluation framework to design and assess gender equality interventions and their effects in research and innovation. The conceptual framework presented herewith embraces the complexity, gender-sensitive and theory-based evaluation approaches ensuring that design and evaluation of gender equality interventions consider the complex systems that constitute the context in which the interventions operate. The evaluation framework offers a non-linear concept, where the notion of contribution - not attribution - to achieve impact is central to the integration of team, organizational and system factors in policy design and evaluation. The paper opens the "black box" to address the question of how and why a policy intervention works and in which context and discusses a systematic process on how to approach the interwoven linkages between input, implementation and effects in gender equality interventions in research and innovation, accounting for context sensitivity and methodological pluralism. The evaluation framework may serve as reference for researchers, evaluators, policymakers and other stakeholders in designing and assessing gender equality interventions, and in further developing their evidence, and theoretical and methodological base.

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了一个概念性评估框架的发展,该框架用于设计和评估性别平等干预措施及其在研究与创新中的效果。本文提出的概念框架包含了复杂性、性别敏感且基于理论的评估方法,确保性别平等干预措施的设计和评估考虑到构成干预措施实施背景的复杂系统。该评估框架提供了一个非线性概念,其中,对实现影响的贡献(而非归因)概念对于在政策设计和评估中整合团队、组织和系统因素至关重要。本文打开了“黑匣子”,以解决政策干预措施如何以及为何起作用、在何种背景下起作用的问题,并讨论了一个系统的过程,即如何处理研究与创新中性别平等干预措施的投入、实施和效果之间的交织联系,同时考虑背景敏感性和方法多元性。该评估框架可为研究人员、评估人员、政策制定者和其他利益相关者在设计和评估性别平等干预措施以及进一步发展其证据、理论和方法基础方面提供参考。

相似文献

1
Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation.为研究与创新中的性别平等干预措施制定一个概念性评估框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101750. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
2
Gender equality regimes and evaluation regimes in Europe and their implications for policy design and evaluation.欧洲的性别平等制度和评估制度及其对政策设计和评估的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Dec;83:101860. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101860. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
A few introductory notes on the special issue on the Evaluation Framework for Promoting Gender Equality in Research and Innovation (EFFORTI).关于“促进研究与创新中的性别平等评估框架(EFFORTI)”特刊的几点引言
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101767. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101767. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Women Underrepresentation in R&I: A Sector Program Assessment of the Contribution of Gender Equality Policies in Research and Innovation.女性在研究与创新中的代表性不足:对性别平等政策在研究与创新中贡献的部门计划评估。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101749. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101749. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Integrating the gender dimension in teaching, research content & knowledge and technology transfer: Validating the EFFORTI evaluation framework through three case studies in Europe.将性别维度融入教学、研究内容、知识与技术转移:通过欧洲的三个案例研究验证EFFORTI评估框架
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101751. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective.理解雅典娜天鹅奖方案作为一个复杂系统中的性别平等复杂社会干预:从比较的欧洲视角分析银质奖行动计划。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0527-x.
7
Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work-An ethnography of a multinational engineering company.探索组织文化与性别平等工作之间的联系——对一家跨国工程公司的民族志研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101791. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
8
Analysing facilitating and hindering factors for implementing gender equality interventions in R&I: Structures and processes.分析在研发与创新中实施性别平等干预措施的促进因素和阻碍因素:结构与流程。
Eval Program Plann. 2019 Dec;77:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101726. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
Network assessment: Design of a framework and indicators for monitoring and self-assessment of a customized gender equality plan in the Mediterranean Engineering Education context.网络评估:地中海工程教育背景下监测和自我评价定制性别平等计划的框架和指标设计。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Aug;87:101932. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101932. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
How do public investments in gender equality initiatives and publication patterns interrelate? The case of Germany.公共投资如何影响性别平等倡议和出版模式的相互关系?以德国为例。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101769. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101769. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Protocol to Assess Contextual Factors During Program Impact Evaluation: A Case Study of a STEM Gender Equity Intervention in Higher Education.项目影响评估期间评估背景因素的方案:以高等教育中的STEM性别平等干预措施为例
Am J Eval. 2023 May 2;45(4). doi: 10.1177/10982140231152281.
2
Strengthening effectiveness evaluations through gender integration to improve programs for women, newborn, child, and adolescent health.通过性别平等融入来加强效果评估,以改善妇女、新生儿、儿童和青少年健康方案。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jun 30;15(sup1):2006420. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2006420.
3
The integration of sex and gender considerations in health policymaking: a scoping review.
将性别平等纳入卫生决策制定的考虑因素:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 2;20(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01411-8.
4
Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions.认识到性别平等干预措施评估中的复杂性。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 4;28:100623. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model.评估和监测英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心性别公平的指标:双因素模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589. eCollection 2020.
6
Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective.理解雅典娜天鹅奖方案作为一个复杂系统中的性别平等复杂社会干预:从比较的欧洲视角分析银质奖行动计划。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0527-x.