Palmén Rachel, Arroyo Lidia, Müller Jörg, Reidl Sybille, Caprile Maria, Unger Maximillian
Open University of Catalonia, Spain.
Open University of Catalonia, Spain.
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Apr;79:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101751. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in research is one of the six European Research Area (ERA) priorities. Integrating the gender dimension in research content and teaching is one of its three objectives. It is arguably the objective where least progress has been made. In this article we contribute to the evidence base by applying the EFFORTI evaluation framework to three empirical case study interventions that aim to integrate the gender dimension in tertiary education and research content. Comparison is based on an evaluation of the design of the intervention, those factors that have enabled/ hindered its implementation as well as an assessment of outcomes and impacts. The findings of the case studies highlight the importance of design, specifically regarding resources, legal status and the definition and operationalisation of the gender concept. Implementation hinges on top-level institutional commitment and mainstreaming gender studies with support of a central unit and crucially gender competence. A lack of recognition and status of gender studies and subsequent innovations was seen to hamper implementation. Outcomes and impacts included an increased awareness and interest in gender, increased gender competence, a push towards gender equality regarding representation and organisational change as well as an improved accreditation process and more and better research.
研究中的性别平等与性别主流化是欧洲研究区(ERA)的六大优先事项之一。将性别维度纳入研究内容和教学是其中三个目标之一。可以说,这是进展最为缓慢的目标。在本文中,我们通过将EFFORTI评估框架应用于三个实证案例研究干预措施,为证据基础做出了贡献。这些干预措施旨在将性别维度纳入高等教育和研究内容。比较基于对干预措施设计的评估、那些促进/阻碍其实施的因素,以及对结果和影响的评估。案例研究的结果突出了设计的重要性,特别是在资源、法律地位以及性别概念的定义和操作化方面。实施取决于高层机构的承诺,以及在中央单位的支持下将性别研究主流化,关键是要有性别能力。性别研究缺乏认可度和地位以及随后的创新被认为阻碍了实施。结果和影响包括对性别的认识和兴趣增加、性别能力增强、在代表性和组织变革方面朝着性别平等迈进、认证过程得到改善以及研究数量增加和质量提高。